Director, Economic and Health Services Research, Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, Virginia; Health Services Management, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Senior Analyst, Economic and Health Services Research, Harvery L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, Virginia.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Apr;20(4):411-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.026. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
The increased use of neuroimaging and innovations in ischemic stroke (IS) treatment have improved outcomes, but the impact on median hospital costs is not well understood.
A retrospective study was conducted using Medicare 5% claims data for 75,525 consecutive index IS hospitalizations for patients aged ≥65 years from 2012 to 2019 (values in 2019 dollars). IS episode cost was calculated in each year for trend analysis and stratified by cost components, including neuroimaging (CT angiography [CTA], CT perfusion [CTP], MRI, and MR angiography [MRA]), treatment (endovascular thrombectomy [EVT] and/or intravenous thrombolysis), and patient sociodemographic factors. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the drivers of high-cost episodes and median regression to assess drivers of median costs.
The median IS episode cost increased by 4.9% from $9,509 in 2012 to $9,973 in 2019 (P = .0021). Treatment with EVT resulted in the greatest odds of having a high-cost (>$20,000) hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 71.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 54.62-94.55), as did intravenous thrombolysis treatment (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.90-3.52). Controlling for other factors, neuroimaging with CTA (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.58-1.87), CTP (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.52), and/or MRA (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38) had greater odds of having high-cost episodes than those without CTA, CTP, and MRA. Length of stay > 4 days (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 3.99-4.72) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.63-2.10) were also associated with high-cost episodes.
From 2012 to 2019, the median IS episode cost increased by 4.9%, with EVT as the main cost driver. However, the increasing treatment cost trends have been partially offset by decreases in median length of stay and in-hospital mortality.
神经影像学的广泛应用和缺血性中风(IS)治疗方面的创新提高了治疗效果,但对医院平均成本的影响尚不清楚。
对 2012 年至 2019 年期间 75525 例年龄≥65 岁的 IS 住院患者的 Medicare 5%索赔数据进行回顾性研究(按 2019 年美元计算)。对每年的 IS 发作成本进行趋势分析,并按成本构成(包括 CT 血管造影术(CTA)、CT 灌注(CTP)、MRI 和磁共振血管造影术(MRA)、治疗(血管内血栓切除术[EVT]和/或静脉溶栓)和患者社会人口因素进行分层。采用逻辑回归分析高成本发作的驱动因素,采用中位数回归分析中位成本的驱动因素。
2012 年 IS 发作的平均成本为 9509 美元,2019 年增加至 9973 美元,增长了 4.9%(P=0.0021)。EVT 治疗的住院费用最高(>$20000)(比值比[OR],71.86;95%置信区间[CI],54.62-94.55),静脉溶栓治疗也一样(OR,3.19;95% CI,2.90-3.52)。控制其他因素后,与未行 CTA、CTP 和 MRA 检查的患者相比,行 CTA(OR,1.72;95% CI,1.58-1.87)、CTP(OR,1.32;95% CI,1.14-1.52)和/或 MRA(OR,1.26;95% CI,1.15-1.38)检查的患者发生高成本发作的几率更高。住院时间>4 天(OR,4.34;95% CI,3.99-4.72)和院内死亡率(OR,1.85;95% CI,1.63-2.10)也与高成本发作相关。
2012 年至 2019 年,IS 发作的平均成本增加了 4.9%,EVT 是主要的成本驱动因素。然而,中位住院时间和院内死亡率的降低部分抵消了治疗成本的上升趋势。