Paediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Thorax. 2022 Oct;77(10):1023-1029. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2021-218378. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
Childhood pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains a diagnostic challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Xpert Ultra for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children in a low TB prevalence setting.
Prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study. Children with clinical or radiological suspicion of pulmonary TB were recruited at 11 paediatric units in Spain. Up to three gastric or sputum specimens were taken on 3 consecutive days, and analysed by Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra and culture in parallel.
86 children were included (median age 4.9 years, IQR 2.0-10.0; 51.2% male). The final diagnosis was pulmonary TB in 75 patients (87.2%); 33 (44.0%) were microbiologically confirmed. A total of 219 specimens, comprising gastric aspirates (n=194; 88.6%) and sputum specimens (n=25; 11.4%), were analysed. Using culture as reference standard and comparing individual specimens, the sensitivity was 37.8% (14/37) for Xpert MTB/RIF and 81.1% (30/37) for Xpert Ultra (p<0.001); specificity was 98.4% (179/182) and 93.4% (170/182), respectively (p=0.02). In the per-patient analysis, considering positive results on any specimen, the sensitivity was 42.9% (9/21) for Xpert MTB/RIF and 81.0% for Xpert Ultra (17/21, p=0.01); specificity was 96.9% (63/65) and 87.7% (57/65, p=0.07), respectively.
In children with pulmonary TB in a low burden setting, Xpert Ultra has significantly higher sensitivity than the previous generation of Xpert assay and only marginally lower specificity. Therefore, in children undergoing evaluation for suspected pulmonary TB, Xpert Ultra should be used in preference to Xpert MTB/RIF whenever possible.
儿童肺结核(TB)仍然是一个诊断难题。本研究旨在评估 Xpert Ultra 在低结核流行地区儿童肺结核诊断中的性能。
前瞻性、多中心、诊断准确性研究。在西班牙的 11 个儿科单位招募了临床或影像学疑似肺结核的儿童。连续 3 天采集 3 份以上的胃或痰液标本,与 Xpert MTB/RIF、Xpert Ultra 和培养并行分析。
86 名儿童纳入研究(中位年龄 4.9 岁,IQR 2.0-10.0;51.2%为男性)。最终诊断为肺结核的 75 例患儿(87.2%);33 例(44.0%)经微生物学证实。共分析了 219 份标本,包括胃抽吸物(n=194;88.6%)和痰标本(n=25;11.4%)。以培养为参考标准,比较单个标本,Xpert MTB/RIF 的敏感性为 37.8%(14/37),Xpert Ultra 的敏感性为 81.1%(30/37)(p<0.001);特异性分别为 98.4%(179/182)和 93.4%(170/182)(p=0.02)。在患者水平分析中,考虑到任何标本的阳性结果,Xpert MTB/RIF 的敏感性为 42.9%(9/21),Xpert Ultra 的敏感性为 81.0%(17/21,p=0.01);特异性分别为 96.9%(63/65)和 87.7%(57/65,p=0.07)。
在低负担地区患有肺结核的儿童中,Xpert Ultra 的敏感性明显高于上一代 Xpert 检测,特异性仅略低。因此,在疑似肺结核患儿进行评估时,只要可能,应优先使用 Xpert Ultra 而不是 Xpert MTB/RIF。