Luo Chengxin, Wu Guixian, Huang Xiangtao, Ding Yaqun, Huang Yarui, Song Qiuyue, Hou Yu, Chen Jieping, Li Xi, Xu Shuangnian
Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023 Feb;58(2):175-185. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01865-6. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
The optimal myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in complete remission (CR) remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the effects of different MAC regimens. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using WinBUGS version 1.4.3. The commonly used MAC regimen Bu/Cy (4-day busulfan for toal 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg intravenously, plus 2-day cyclophosphamide for toal 120 mg/kg intravenously) is chosen as the common comparator. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with the associated 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) are obtained for all comparisons. We included 19 eligible studies, involving 8104 AML patients and 9 MAC regimens. Compared with Bu/Cy, 3-day busulfan plus fludarabine and thiotepa (Bu3/Flu/TT) is associated with significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.70; 95% CrI, 0.51 to 0.96) and lower risk of relapse (HR, 0.59; 95% CrI, 0.35 to 0.98). Bu3/Flu/TT is also associated with superior overall survival than Cy/TBI (cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation), and lower risk of relapse than Bu4/Flu (4-day busulfan plus fludarabine). These results suggest that thiotepa-based new MAC regimen Bu3/Flu/TT is associated with improved outcomes in AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT in CR and worth further investigation.
对于处于完全缓解(CR)期且正在接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的成年急性髓系白血病(AML)患者而言,最佳的清髓性预处理(MAC)方案仍不明确。我们进行了一项系统评价和网状Meta分析,以比较不同MAC方案的效果。使用WinBUGS 1.4.3版本进行贝叶斯网状Meta分析。常用的MAC方案Bu/Cy(4天的白消安,口服总量16mg/kg或静脉注射12.8mg/kg,加2天的环磷酰胺,静脉注射总量120mg/kg)被选为共同对照。对所有比较均获得合并风险比(HR)及其相关的95%可信度区间(95%CrI)。我们纳入了19项符合条件的研究,涉及8104例AML患者和9种MAC方案。与Bu/Cy相比,3天的白消安加氟达拉滨和塞替派(Bu3/Flu/TT)与显著更好的总生存期(HR,0.70;95%CrI,0.51至0.96)以及更低的复发风险(HR,0.59;95%CrI,0.35至0.98)相关。Bu3/Flu/TT与Cy/TBI(环磷酰胺加全身照射)相比总生存期也更优,与Bu4/Flu(4天的白消安加氟达拉滨)相比复发风险更低。这些结果表明,以塞替派为基础的新MAC方案Bu3/Flu/TT与处于CR期且正在接受allo-HSCT的AML患者改善的预后相关,值得进一步研究。