抗血管生成药物在实体瘤儿科患者中的安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety of Anti-Angiogenic Drugs in Pediatric Patients with Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Spini Andrea, Ciccone Valerio, Rosellini Pietro, Ziche Marina, Lucenteforte Ersilia, Salvo Francesco, Donnini Sandra

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, 53100 Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;14(21):5315. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215315.

Abstract

Cancer is a clinical condition that can benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs (AADs). Given the low prevalence and the heterogeneity of childhood cancers, information about the safety of these drugs in pediatric patients is partially assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of AADs in pediatric patients with solid tumors. Clinical trials and observational studies were searched in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials database For each included study, adverse events (AEs) were extracted. A meta-analysis was conducted by pooling proportions of AEs using a random intercept logistic regression model. Seventy studies were retrieved. Most part were clinical trials (55 out of 70), and only fifteen observational studies were found. Overall, proportion of serious and non-serious AEs of AADs used as monotherapy was 46% and 89%, respectively. Proportions of serious AEs varied among drugs: sunitinib, 79%; lenvatinib, 64%; sorafenib, 48%; ramucirumab, 41%; pazopanib, 30%; and vandetanib, 27%. A higher proportion of non-serious hematological AEs was found in the patients receiving pazopanib with respect to sunitinib and lenvatinib. The safety profile of AADs has been extensively investigated for mostly drugs in phase I and II trials and is limited to acute toxicities. Overall, one out of two patients using AAD drugs in monotherapy experienced a serious AE despite proportions varied per single drugs. When AADs were combined with standard chemotherapy, the proportion of AEs varied in relation to the single combinations.

摘要

癌症是一种可受益于抗血管生成药物(AADs)的临床病症。鉴于儿童癌症的低发病率和异质性,关于这些药物在儿科患者中的安全性信息仅得到部分评估。本研究的目的是评估AADs在患有实体瘤的儿科患者中的安全性。在PubMed、科学引文索引(ISI)Web of Science和临床试验数据库中检索了临床试验和观察性研究。对于每项纳入研究,提取不良事件(AE)。使用随机截距逻辑回归模型汇总AE比例进行荟萃分析。共检索到70项研究。大部分是临床试验(70项中的55项),仅发现15项观察性研究。总体而言,作为单一疗法使用的AADs的严重和非严重AE比例分别为46%和89%。严重AE比例因药物而异:舒尼替尼为79%;乐伐替尼为64%;索拉非尼为48%;雷莫西尤单抗为41%;帕唑帕尼为30%;凡德他尼为27%。与舒尼替尼和乐伐替尼相比,接受帕唑帕尼治疗的患者中发现非严重血液学AE的比例更高。对于大多数药物,AADs的安全性概况在I期和II期试验中已得到广泛研究,且仅限于急性毒性。总体而言,尽管每种药物的比例有所不同,但接受AAD单一疗法的患者中有二分之一经历了严重AE。当AADs与标准化疗联合使用时,AE比例因单一组合而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/9654149/e6fdb27e0e39/cancers-14-05315-g001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索