Sonne Christian, Alstrup Aage Kristian Olsen, Pertoldi Cino, Frikke John, Linder Anne Cathrine, Styrishave Bjarne
Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;12(21):3017. doi: 10.3390/ani12213017.
To increase the efficiency and geographic expansion of nature conservation, large grazers have recently been used, either in the form of wild hoof-bearing animals or as domesticated ruminants including cattle. Using physical fencing limits migrating wildlife, while virtual fences encourage the animals to stay in the desired area without physical restrictions on wild animals. However, virtual fences raise ethical questions regarding the electric impulses emitted by the collar and stress in the fenced animals. Here, we tested if keeping twelve Angus cows () in a virtual fencing (Nofence©) compromised their welfare. For this purpose, we collected manure samples from five cows every second day prior to and after the transition from traditional to virtual fencing over a period of 18 days. Cortisol concentrations were 20.6 ± 5.23 ng/g / (mean ± SD), ranging from 12 to 42 ng/g / across individuals and concentrations did not change over the study period. We, therefore, conclude that there is no evidence suggesting that the cows were stressed from the use for virtual fencing, thus making virtual fencing a reasonable alternative to traditional electric physical fencing of cows.
为提高自然保护的效率并扩大其地理范围,近来人们采用大型食草动物,这些动物或是野生有蹄类动物,或是包括牛在内的家养反刍动物。使用实体围栏会限制野生动物的迁徙,而虚拟围栏则鼓励动物待在指定区域,且不会对野生动物造成实体限制。然而,虚拟围栏引发了有关项圈发出的电脉冲以及围栏内动物应激反应的伦理问题。在此,我们测试了将12头安格斯奶牛置于虚拟围栏(Nofence©)中是否会损害它们的福利。为此,在为期18天的时间里,我们在从传统围栏过渡到虚拟围栏之前和之后,每隔一天从5头奶牛身上采集粪便样本。皮质醇浓度为20.6±5.23纳克/克干物质(平均值±标准差),个体间浓度范围为12至42纳克/克干物质,且在研究期间浓度没有变化。因此,我们得出结论,没有证据表明奶牛因使用虚拟围栏而受到应激,从而使虚拟围栏成为奶牛传统电实体围栏的合理替代方案。