• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于氨基酸的番茄基因组热休克蛋白分析。

Analysis of Heat Shock Proteins Based on Amino Acids for the Tomato Genome.

机构信息

National Center of Agricultural Technology, Sustainability and Environment, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology KACST, Box 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;13(11):2014. doi: 10.3390/genes13112014.

DOI:10.3390/genes13112014
PMID:36360251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9690137/
Abstract

This research aimed to investigate heat shock proteins in the tomato genome through the analysis of amino acids. The highest length among sequences was found in seq19 with 3534 base pairs. This seq19 was reported and contained a family of proteins known as that have a domain of transcriptional activation for tolerance to heat and other abiotic stresses. The values of the codon adaptation index (CAI) ranged from 0.80 in Seq19 to 0.65 in Seq10, based on the mRNA of heat shock proteins for tomatoes. Asparagine (AAT, AAC), aspartic acid (GAT, GAC), phenylalanine (TTT, TTC), and tyrosine (TAT, TAC) have relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values bigger than 0.5. In modified relative codon bias (MRCBS), the high gene expressions of the amino acids under heat stress were histidine, tryptophan, asparagine, aspartic acid, lysine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, cysteine, and threonine. RSCU values that were less than 0.5 were considered rare codons that affected the rate of translation, and thus selection could be effective by reducing the frequency of expressed genes under heat stress. The normal distribution of RSCU shows about 68% of the values drawn from the standard normal distribution were within 0.22 and -0.22 standard deviations that tend to cluster around the mean. The most critical component based on principal component analysis (PCA) was the RSCU. These findings would help plant breeders in the development of growth habits for tomatoes during breeding programs.

摘要

本研究旨在通过分析氨基酸来研究番茄基因组中的热休克蛋白。在序列中,seq19 的长度最长,为 3534 个碱基对。seq19 已被报道,并包含一个被称为 的蛋白质家族,该家族具有转录激活域,可耐受热和其他非生物胁迫。番茄热休克蛋白 mRNA 的密码子适应指数 (CAI) 值范围为 0.80(Seq19)至 0.65(Seq10)。天冬酰胺 (AAT、AAC)、天冬氨酸 (GAT、GAC)、苯丙氨酸 (TTT、TTC) 和酪氨酸 (TAT、TAC) 的相对同义密码子使用 (RSCU) 值大于 0.5。在改良相对密码子偏性 (MRCBS) 中,组氨酸、色氨酸、天冬酰胺、天冬氨酸、赖氨酸、苯丙氨酸、异亮氨酸、半胱氨酸和苏氨酸在热胁迫下的高基因表达。RSCU 值小于 0.5 被认为是稀有密码子,会影响翻译速度,因此在热胁迫下降低表达基因的频率可能会产生有效的选择。RSCU 的正态分布显示,从标准正态分布中抽取的约 68%的值在 0.22 和-0.22 标准差范围内,倾向于围绕平均值聚集。基于主成分分析 (PCA) 的最关键组件是 RSCU。这些发现将有助于植物育种家在番茄育种计划中开发番茄的生长习性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/e116f42775c6/genes-13-02014-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/301b2522e67c/genes-13-02014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/0be7d3cfda6a/genes-13-02014-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/bea35961d24e/genes-13-02014-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/e116f42775c6/genes-13-02014-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/301b2522e67c/genes-13-02014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/0be7d3cfda6a/genes-13-02014-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/bea35961d24e/genes-13-02014-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb01/9690137/e116f42775c6/genes-13-02014-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of Heat Shock Proteins Based on Amino Acids for the Tomato Genome.基于氨基酸的番茄基因组热休克蛋白分析。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;13(11):2014. doi: 10.3390/genes13112014.
2
Analysis of chromosomes and nucleotides in rice to predict gene expression through codon usage pattern.通过密码子使用模式分析水稻中的染色体和核苷酸以预测基因表达。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Aug;28(8):4569-4574. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.059. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
Prediction of gene expression under drought stress in spring wheat using codon usage pattern.利用密码子使用模式预测春小麦干旱胁迫下的基因表达
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jul;28(7):4000-4004. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
The effective number of codons for individual amino acids: some codons are more optimal than others.个别氨基酸的有效密码子数量:某些密码子比其他密码子更具优化性。
Gene. 2003 Nov 27;320:185-90. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00829-1.
5
Looking into the genome of Thermosynechococcus elongatus (thermophilic cyanobacteria) with codon selection and usage perspective.从密码子选择和使用的角度研究嗜热蓝藻长链嗜热栖热菌的基因组。
Int J Bioinform Res Appl. 2015;11(2):130-41. doi: 10.1504/IJBRA.2015.068088.
6
[Analysis of factors shaping S. pneumoniae codon usage].[影响肺炎链球菌密码子使用的因素分析]
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2002;29(8):747-52.
7
Adaptation of Borrelia burgdorferi to its natural hosts by synonymous codon and amino acid usage.伯氏疏螺旋体通过同义密码子和氨基酸使用来适应其自然宿主。
J Basic Microbiol. 2018 May;58(5):414-424. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201700652. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Transfer RNA gene numbers may not be completely responsible for the codon usage bias in asparagine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine in the high expression genes in bacteria.转移 RNA 基因数量可能不能完全解释细菌中高表达基因中天门冬酰胺、异亮氨酸、苯丙氨酸和酪氨酸的密码子使用偏好性。
J Mol Evol. 2012 Aug;75(1-2):34-42. doi: 10.1007/s00239-012-9524-1. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
9
Comparative genomic analysis for nucleotide, codon, and amino acid usage patterns of mycoplasmas.支原体核苷酸、密码子和氨基酸使用模式的比较基因组分析。
J Basic Microbiol. 2018 May;58(5):425-439. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201700490. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
[Genome-wide identification and analysis of heat shock protein 90 in tomato].[番茄中热休克蛋白90的全基因组鉴定与分析]
Yi Chuan. 2014 Oct;36(10):1043-52. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2014.1043.

引用本文的文献

1
A Molecular Orchestration of Plant Translation under Abiotic Stress.非生物胁迫下植物翻译的分子协调。
Cells. 2023 Oct 13;12(20):2445. doi: 10.3390/cells12202445.

本文引用的文献

1
Decoding the codon usage patterns in Y-domain region of hepatitis E viruses.解析戊型肝炎病毒Y结构域区域的密码子使用模式。
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2022 Apr 11;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s43141-022-00319-2.
2
Genome-wide cis-decoding for expression design in tomato using cistrome data and explainable deep learning.利用顺式作用元件组数据和可解释深度学习进行番茄基因表达设计的全基因组顺式解码。
Plant Cell. 2022 May 24;34(6):2174-2187. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac079.
3
A chromosome scale tomato genome built from complementary PacBio and Nanopore sequences alone reveals extensive linkage drag during breeding.
仅由互补的PacBio和Nanopore序列构建的染色体级番茄基因组揭示了育种过程中广泛的连锁累赘。
Plant J. 2022 Apr;110(2):572-588. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15690. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
4
Synonymous but Not Silent: The Codon Usage Code for Gene Expression and Protein Folding.同义而非沉默:基因表达和蛋白质折叠的密码子使用代码。
Annu Rev Biochem. 2021 Jun 20;90:375-401. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-071320-112701. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Genome-wide survey of the amino acid transporter gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Identification, expression analysis and response to abiotic stress.小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)氨基酸转运蛋白基因家族的全基因组研究:鉴定、表达分析及对非生物胁迫的响应。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Nov 1;162:1372-1387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.302. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
6
Codon usage pattern and predicted gene expression in .……中的密码子使用模式和预测的基因表达
Gene X. 2019 Mar 6;2:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.100012. eCollection 2019 Jun.
7
Structural and functional properties of proteins interacting with small heat shock proteins.与小分子热休克蛋白相互作用的蛋白质的结构和功能特性。
Cell Stress Chaperones. 2020 Jul;25(4):629-637. doi: 10.1007/s12192-020-01097-x. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
8
Comparative co-expression network analysis extracts the gene affecting to shoot elongation of tomato.比较共表达网络分析提取影响番茄茎伸长的基因。
Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo). 2019 Sep 25;36(3):143-153. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.19.0603a.
9
Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of drought-tolerant and susceptible sesame genotypes in response to drought stress.转录组和代谢组学分析耐旱和易感芝麻基因型对干旱胁迫的响应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1880-1.
10
The repressor and co-activator HsfB1 regulates the major heat stress transcription factors in tomato.阻遏物和共激活因子 HsfB1 调节番茄中的主要热应激转录因子。
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Mar;42(3):874-890. doi: 10.1111/pce.13434. Epub 2018 Oct 11.