Rezoagli Emanuele, Signori Davide, Grassi Alice, Rabboni Francesca, Lucchini Alberto, Bellani Giacomo, Foti Giuseppe
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Respiration. 2023;102(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000526314. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
CO2 rebreathing is one of the risks associated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV), possibly contributing to failure. In a bench study, we showed that a novel mask design, with separate limbs for inflow and outflow gases, significantly reduced CO2 rebreathing in different ventilation settings.
The study aimed to test whether a new mask design could 1) reduce CO2 rebreathing in healthy volunteers during NIV (phase 1) and 2) reduce minute ventilation (phase 2).
Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to NIV using two masks in a crossover design: a traditional single-limb mask for inflow and outflow gases and a mask with two separated limbs. In phase 1, six ventilation settings were tested for each mask: CPAP (PEEP 5 cmH2O) and pressure support ventilation (PSV, PS Level 5 cmH2O) using a mechanical ventilator with a bias flow of 8 or 20 L/min; free-flow CPAP (PEEP 5 cmH2O) with 60 or 90 L/min of gas flow. A nasal cannula was inserted in one nostril of the volunteers and connected to a CO2 gas analyzer to measure CO2 during the respiratory cycle. In phase 2, volunteers underwent a prolonged time of ventilation in CPAP 90 L/min and PSV with 20 L/min of bias flow. During free-flow CPAP, electrical impedance tomography was used to record the change in impedance during tidal breathing and then estimate tidal volume.
Ten healthy adults were enrolled in phase 1, and 8 volunteers in phase 2. CO2 during inspiration was significantly lower in each setting with the two-limb versus the one-limb mask (p < 0.001). The maximum CO2 reduction was observed in the continuous-flow CPAP settings. EtCO2 was lower with the two-limb mask compared to the one-limb mask (p < 0.001). However, no difference in minute ventilation was observed between the two masks.
The new mask design with two ports for inhaled and exhaled gases reduced the amount of CO2 rebreathing in all tested ventilation settings. The CO2 rebreathing reduction did not decrease minute ventilation in healthy volunteers.
二氧化碳重复吸入是非侵入性通气(NIV)相关的风险之一,可能导致通气失败。在一项实验台研究中,我们发现一种新型面罩设计,其进、出气管道分开,在不同通气设置下能显著减少二氧化碳重复吸入。
本研究旨在测试一种新的面罩设计能否:1)在健康志愿者进行无创通气时减少二氧化碳重复吸入(第一阶段);2)减少分钟通气量(第二阶段)。
健康志愿者采用交叉设计,随机分配使用两种面罩进行无创通气:一种是传统的单管道进、出气面罩,另一种是有两个分开管道的面罩。在第一阶段,对每个面罩测试六种通气设置:使用偏流为8或20 L/min的机械通气机进行持续气道正压通气(CPAP,呼气末正压5 cmH₂O)和压力支持通气(PSV,压力支持水平5 cmH₂O);自由流CPAP(呼气末正压5 cmH₂O),气流速度为60或90 L/min。在志愿者的一个鼻孔中插入鼻导管,并连接到二氧化碳气体分析仪,以测量呼吸周期中的二氧化碳。在第二阶段,志愿者在CPAP 90 L/min和偏流为20 L/min的PSV模式下进行长时间通气。在自由流CPAP期间,使用电阻抗断层扫描记录潮气呼吸期间的阻抗变化,然后估算潮气量。
第一阶段招募了10名健康成年人,第二阶段有8名志愿者。在每种设置下,与单管道面罩相比,双管道面罩吸气时的二氧化碳显著降低(p < 0.001)。在持续流CPAP设置中观察到最大的二氧化碳降低。与单管道面罩相比,双管道面罩的呼气末二氧化碳较低(p < 0.001)。然而,两种面罩之间未观察到分钟通气量的差异。
这种具有进气和出气两个端口的新型面罩设计在所有测试的通气设置中都减少了二氧化碳重复吸入量。在健康志愿者中,减少二氧化碳重复吸入并未降低分钟通气量。