Suppr超能文献

重症监护呼吸机提供无创通气期间二氧化碳潜在的重复吸入。

Potential rebreathing of carbon dioxide during noninvasive ventilation provided by critical care ventilator.

作者信息

Al Hussain Ahmed, Vines David

机构信息

Respiratory Care Services Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Can J Respir Ther. 2022 Jul 27;58:111-114. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2022-013. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critical care ventilators are frequently used to provide noninvasive ventilation (NIV) support to critically ill patients. Questions remain regarding carbon dioxide (CO) clearance while using a critical care ventilator and dual limb circuit with various patient interfaces. The purpose of this study is to determine the positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) level required to effectively washout CO for full-face and oronasal masks when using a dual limb circuit.

METHOD

This randomized crossover trial was conducted at an academic medical center in the Midwest United States. After obtaining informed consent, eight healthy volunteers were placed on a 980 Puritan Bennett (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) ventilator operating in the NIV mode. All subjects performed 20 min of breathing on four levels of PEEP (0, 2, 4, and 5 cm HO) and pressure support of 5 cm HO. NIV settings were applied to four masks (two oronasal and two full-face masks) that were randomly selected with a 5-min washout period between each mask. The fraction of inspired carbon dioxide ( ) was sampled/monitored with a nasal cannula using a Capnostream 20p monitor (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and reported as percentages. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to reveal significant differences across PEEP levels. Pairwise comparisons of the groups were made using Mann-Whitney tests with a family-wise error correction.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) was significantly lower 0.0% (0%-0.92%) at PEEP of 5 compared to 1.83% (0.66%-4.0%; < 0.001) at PEEP of 0 or 1.0% (0.33%-2.66%; = 0.002) at PEEP of 2. was significantly lower 0.5% (0%-1.92%) at PEEP of 4 compared to PEEP of 0 ( = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A PEEP level of at least 5 cm HO associated with the reported leak was required to minimize the likelihood of CO rebreathing while using a critical care ventilator to provide NIV with a double limb circuit and full-face or oronasal masks.

摘要

背景

重症监护呼吸机常用于为重症患者提供无创通气(NIV)支持。在使用重症监护呼吸机和带有各种患者接口的双肢回路时,关于二氧化碳(CO₂)清除仍存在问题。本研究的目的是确定在使用双肢回路时,为全面罩和口鼻面罩有效排出CO₂所需的呼气末正压(PEEP)水平。

方法

这项随机交叉试验在美国中西部的一家学术医疗中心进行。获得知情同意后,八名健康志愿者被置于一台以NIV模式运行的980 Puritan Bennett(美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)呼吸机上。所有受试者在四个PEEP水平(0、2、4和5 cmH₂O)和5 cmH₂O的压力支持下进行20分钟的呼吸。NIV设置应用于四个面罩(两个口鼻面罩和两个全面罩),这些面罩是随机选择的,每个面罩之间有5分钟的冲洗期。使用Capnostream 20p监测仪(美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)通过鼻导管对吸入二氧化碳分数( )进行采样/监测,并以百分比报告。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验来揭示不同PEEP水平之间的显著差异。使用带有家族性错误校正的Mann-Whitney检验对各组进行成对比较。

结果

与PEEP为0时的1.83%(0.66%-4.0%;P<0.001)或PEEP为2时的1.0%(0.33%-2.66%;P = 0.002)相比,PEEP为5时的中位数(IQR) 显著更低,为0.0%(0%-0.92%)。与PEEP为0时相比,PEEP为4时的 显著更低,为0.5%(0%-1.92%)(P = 0.001)。

结论

在使用重症监护呼吸机通过双肢回路和全面罩或口鼻面罩提供NIV时,需要至少5 cmH₂O的PEEP水平并伴有报告的漏气,以尽量减少CO₂重复吸入的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验