Bonaca Marc P, Im KyungAh, Magnani Giulia, Bansilal Sameer, Dellborg Mikael, Storey Robert F, Bhatt Deepak L, Steg P Gabriel, Cohen Marc, Johanson Per, Braunwald Eugene, Sabatine Marc S
Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 2115 N Scranton St Suite 2040, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2022 Dec 21;43(48):5037-5044. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac402.
In patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) on aspirin, the addition of ticagrelor reduces ischaemic risk but increases bleeding risk. The simultaneous assessment of baseline ischaemic and bleeding risk may assist clinicians in selecting patients who are most likely to have a favourable risk/benefit profile with long-term ticagrelor.
PEGASUS-TIMI 54 randomized 21 162 prior MI patients, 13 956 of which to the approved 60 mg dose or placebo and who had all necessary data. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke, and the primary safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding; differences in Kaplan-Meier event rates at 3 years are presented. Post-hoc subgroups based on predictors of bleeding and ischaemic risk were merged into a selection algorithm. Patients were divided into four groups: those with a bleeding predictor (n = 2721, 19%) and then those without a bleeding predictor and either 0-1 ischaemic risk factor (IRF; n = 3004, 22%), 2 IRF (n = 4903, 35%), or ≥3 IRF (n = 3328, 24%). In patients at high bleeding risk, ticagrelor increased bleeding [absolute risk difference (ARD) +2.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6, 3.9] and did not reduce the primary efficacy endpoint (ARD +0.08%, 95% CI -2.4 to 2.5). In patients at low bleeding risk, the ARDs in the primary efficacy endpoint with ticagrelor were -0.5% (-2.2, 1.3), -1.5% (-3.1, 0.02), and -2.6% (-5.0, -0.24, P = 0.03) in those with ≤1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively (P = 0.076 for trend across groups). There were significant trends for greater absolute risk reductions for cardiovascular death (P-trend 0.018), all-cause mortality (P-trend 0.027), and net outcomes (P-trend 0.037) with ticagrelor across these risk groups.
In a post-hoc exploratory analysis of patients with prior MI, long-term ticagrelor therapy appears to be best suited for those with prior MI with multiple IRFs at low bleeding risk.
NCT01225562 ClinicalTrials.gov.
对于已服用阿司匹林的既往心肌梗死(MI)患者,加用替格瑞洛可降低缺血风险,但会增加出血风险。同时评估基线缺血和出血风险可能有助于临床医生选择那些长期使用替格瑞洛最有可能获得有利风险/获益比的患者。
PEGASUS-TIMI 54研究将21162例既往MI患者随机分组,其中13956例接受批准的60mg剂量或安慰剂治疗且具备所有必要数据。主要疗效终点为心血管死亡、MI或卒中,主要安全结局为TIMI大出血;呈现了3年时Kaplan-Meier事件发生率的差异。基于出血和缺血风险预测因素的事后亚组被合并为一种选择算法。患者被分为四组:有出血预测因素者(n = 2721,19%),然后是没有出血预测因素且有0 - 1个缺血风险因素(IRF)者(n = 3004,22%)、有2个IRF者(n = 4903,35%)或≥3个IRF者(n = 3328,24%)。在高出血风险患者中,替格瑞洛增加了出血风险[绝对风险差异(ARD)+2.3%,95%置信区间(CI)0.6,3.9],且未降低主要疗效终点(ARD +0.08%,95% CI -2.4至2.5)。在低出血风险患者中,替格瑞洛治疗主要疗效终点的ARD在有≤1个、2个和3个风险因素的患者中分别为-0.5%(-2.2,1.3)、-1.5%(-3.1,0.02)和-2.6%(-5.0,-0.24,P = 0.03)(各组间趋势P = 0.076)。在这些风险组中,替格瑞洛在心血管死亡(P趋势0.018)、全因死亡率(P趋势0.027)和净结局(P趋势0.037)方面有更大绝对风险降低的显著趋势。
在对既往MI患者的事后探索性分析中,长期替格瑞洛治疗似乎最适合那些有多个IRF且出血风险低的既往MI患者。
NCT01225562 ClinicalTrials.gov。