Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania; and.
ICCO Clinics, Brasov, Romania.
Am J Ther. 2023;30(1):e10-e16. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001579. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
After 6 months of therapy, cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) has been shown to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance, and quality of life as well as reduce the rate of hospitalizations in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), but long-term effects data are lacking, with no randomized trial to date.
What is the long-term benefit of the CCM device implantation in symptomatic patients with severe, optimally treated HFrEF?
We conducted a prospective trial involving patients with symptomatic HFrEF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%] who were supported by a CCM device.
Twenty patients (19 men), aged 66.5 ± 6.9 years, were provided with CCM therapy and followed up for an average duration of 321.7 ± 113.5 days. The etiology of heart failure was ischemic in 16 patients (80%), 9 patients (45%) had atrial fibrillation, 6 patients (30%) had diabetes mellitus, and mean creatinine clearance value was 54.8 ± 13.0 mL/min. Eleven patients (60%) had LVEF ≤25%. Although all the patients had an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator, 6 of them (30%) also had resynchronization therapy. The pharmacological treatment has been optimized in all patients. One year after implantation, the LVEF increased from 24.68% ± 4.5 to 34.6 ± 5 ( P < 0.0001), NYHA class improved from 3.2 ± 0.5 to 1.4 ± 0.5 ( P < 0.0001), and exercise tolerance evaluated with a 6-Minute Walk Test increased (from 307.9 ± 74.1 m to 567 ± 99.5 m; P < 0.00001). These improvements were largely seen in the first 6 months.
Over the course of a year, CCM therapy was associated with improved LVEF and NYHA class, as well as significantly better exercise tolerance, even in patients with atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy and did not seem to be associated with additional significant device-related problems.
在经过 6 个月的治疗后,心脏收缩力调节(CCM)已被证明可改善心力衰竭伴有射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的症状、运动耐量和生活质量,并降低住院率,但缺乏长期效果数据,迄今为止尚无随机试验。
在接受最佳治疗的严重 HFrEF 症状性患者中,CCM 设备植入的长期获益是什么?
我们进行了一项前瞻性试验,纳入了接受 CCM 治疗的症状性 HFrEF 患者(纽约心脏协会[NYHA]III 或 IV 级,左心室射血分数[LVEF]≤35%)。
20 名患者(19 名男性),年龄 66.5±6.9 岁,接受 CCM 治疗,并平均随访 321.7±113.5 天。心力衰竭的病因在 16 名患者(80%)中为缺血性,9 名患者(45%)患有心房颤动,6 名患者(30%)患有糖尿病,平均肌酐清除率为 54.8±13.0mL/min。11 名患者(60%)的 LVEF≤25%。尽管所有患者均植入了心脏复律除颤器,但其中 6 名患者(30%)还接受了再同步治疗。所有患者的药物治疗均已优化。植入后 1 年,LVEF 从 24.68%±4.5 增加至 34.6±5(P<0.0001),NYHA 心功能分级从 3.2±0.5 改善至 1.4±0.5(P<0.0001),6 分钟步行试验评估的运动耐量增加(从 307.9±74.1m 增加至 567±99.5m;P<0.00001)。这些改善主要发生在最初的 6 个月内。
在 1 年的时间里,CCM 治疗与 LVEF 和 NYHA 心功能分级的改善以及运动耐量的显著提高相关,即使在伴有心房颤动和心脏再同步治疗的患者中也是如此,且似乎与额外的显著设备相关问题无关。