Epidemiology Program, College of Public Health & Human Sciences, Oregon State University, USA.
National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, University College Cork, Ireland.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Dec;279:183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
Admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in obstetrics is often used as a proxy for maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity (MNM/SMM) events. Understanding incidence and management of pregnant or postpartum patients requiring critical care (CC) is thus important for continued improvement of maternity care. This study aims to describe provision of critical care in obstetrics in the Republic of Ireland.
The national clinical audit on critical care included 15 of 19 maternity units in Ireland (2014-2016). 960 pregnant or postpartum (within 42 days) individuals who required CC were included. Data were reported on all cases requiring level 2 or level 3 CC. We calculated basic descriptive statistics for diagnosis and process of care variables, and compared characteristics of women requiring level 2 care to those requiring level 3. Outcomes included diagnoses necessitating critical care; additional complications; level of care required; care process outcomes such as length of stay, consultation with non-obstetric specialties, location of maternal critical care, and neonatal care provision.
Overall, the rate of critical care in obstetrics for these hospitals was 1 in 131 live births; 900 of the 960 cases required level 2 care only. Hypertensive disorders contributed to the need for critical care for 1 in 242; hemorrhage, 1 in 422; and infections, 1 in 926. A substantial minority (15.7%) had more than one diagnosis, accounting for 40% of level 3 care. Serious complications were rare (eg, hysterectomy, 1 in 3846). Parity, hospital size, and identification as high-risk antenatally (<50% cases) were associated with requiring level 3 care. Critical care was provided in multiple locations, including ICUs, HDUs, and operating theatres. Only 23.8% of patients received CC in an ICU, suggesting ICU admission is not an ideal method for identifying severe maternal morbidity.
We reported rates of critical care admission and primary diagnoses within the range of other published estimates, but huge variability exists in the literature, and within our data. ICU admission in and of itself iss not a reliable proxy for having received level 2 or 3 obstetric critical care in Ireland.
在产科,入住重症监护病房(ICU)通常被用作孕产妇接近死亡/严重产妇发病率(MNM/SMM)事件的替代指标。因此,了解需要重症监护的孕妇或产后患者的发病率和处理方法对于持续改善产科护理非常重要。本研究旨在描述爱尔兰产科提供重症监护的情况。
全国重症监护临床审计包括爱尔兰 19 个产科单位中的 15 个(2014-2016 年)。共纳入 960 名需要 CC 的孕妇或产后(42 天内)个体。报告了所有需要 2 级或 3 级 CC 的病例的数据。我们计算了诊断和护理过程变量的基本描述性统计数据,并比较了需要 2 级护理的女性与需要 3 级护理的女性的特征。结果包括需要重症监护的诊断;其他并发症;所需护理水平;护理过程结果,如住院时间、非产科专科会诊、产妇重症监护地点和新生儿护理提供情况。
总体而言,这些医院产科的重症监护率为每 131 例活产 1 例;960 例病例中,900 例仅需要 2 级护理。高血压疾病导致 1/242 需要重症监护;出血导致 1/422 需要重症监护;感染导致 1/926 需要重症监护。少数(15.7%)有多种诊断,占 3 级护理的 40%。严重并发症罕见(例如,子宫切除术,每 3846 例 1 例)。产次、医院规模和产前高危(<50%病例)与需要 3 级护理相关。重症监护在多个地点进行,包括 ICU、HDU 和手术室。只有 23.8%的患者在 ICU 接受 CC,这表明 ICU 入院并不是识别严重产妇发病率的理想方法。
我们报告了爱尔兰重症监护入院率和主要诊断率在其他已发表估计值的范围内,但文献中存在巨大差异,我们的数据也存在差异。在爱尔兰,ICU 入院本身并不能可靠地替代接受 2 级或 3 级产科重症监护。