Suppr超能文献

评价补充基于计算机的教程对增强白内障手术知情同意过程的疗效:一项探索性随机临床试验。

An evaluation of the efficacy of a supplemental computer-based tutorial to enhance the informed consent process for cataract surgery: an exploratory randomized clinical study.

机构信息

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, 1140, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 11;22(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02652-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess whether informing patients with a computer-based tutorial in addition to standard informed consent influences the patient's attitude towards surgery and increases patient's knowledge.

METHODS

In this prospective, exploratory, randomized clinical study, patients scheduled for their first eye cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups, receiving standard face-to-face informed consent (control group) or additionally using an interactive computer-based tool (CatInfo) containing an audiovisual presentation about cataract and its treatment (study group). Cataract-related knowledge and decisional confidence (decisional conflict scale (DCS)) were assessed as well as one-month postoperatively decisional regret (decision regret scale (DRS)) and willingness to exchange face-to-face discussion time for the use of such a tool.

RESULTS

The study comprised 134 patients, 64 patients in the study group and 70 in the control group. Patients in the study group answered more questions correctly, 16.3 ± 2.0 (median 16.5, 11.0-19.0) versus 15.5 ± 1.9 (median 16.0, 8.0-19.0; p = 0.01). Patients showed a high decisional confidence with a study group mean DCS score of 92.4 ± 9.8 (median 96.9, 65.6-100) and control group score of 91.6 ± 10.9 (median 95.3, 43.3-100; p = 0.52). Mean DRS score in the study group was 2.5 ± 8.0 (median 0, 0-40) and 4.3 ± 12.5 (median 0, 0-75) in the control group (p = 0.14). Of study group patients 23 (67.6%) were willing to trade time, on average 158 ± 180 s (median 120 s, 45-900). Satisfaction with the tool was high with a mean of 9.1 ± 1.3 out of 10 (median 9.7, 5.0-10).

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract-related knowledge was generally good, with slightly higher scores in the study group. In both groups, decisional confidence was high and regret after surgery was low. A tendency towards slightly higher decisional confidence and lower regret was found in the study group, although these differences were not statistically significant. Additional use of an interactive computer-based tool may prove useful in the informed consent process in a high-volume cataract outpatient setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04975126. Retrospectively registered - July 23, 2021.

摘要

背景

评估在标准知情同意的基础上增加基于计算机的教程是否会影响患者对手术的态度并增加患者的知识。

方法

在这项前瞻性、探索性、随机临床试验中,计划进行首次白内障手术的患者被随机分配到两组,分别接受标准的面对面知情同意(对照组)或另外使用包含白内障及其治疗的视听演示的交互式计算机工具(CatInfo)(研究组)。评估白内障相关知识和决策信心(决策冲突量表(DCS)),以及术后一个月的决策后悔(决策后悔量表(DRS))和愿意用这种工具换取面对面讨论时间的意愿。

结果

该研究共纳入 134 名患者,研究组 64 名,对照组 70 名。研究组患者回答的正确问题更多,分别为 16.3±2.0(中位数 16.5,11.0-19.0)和 15.5±1.9(中位数 16.0,8.0-19.0;p=0.01)。两组患者的决策信心均较高,研究组 DCS 平均得分为 92.4±9.8(中位数 96.9,65.6-100),对照组得分为 91.6±10.9(中位数 95.3,43.3-100;p=0.52)。研究组 DRS 平均得分为 2.5±8.0(中位数 0,0-40),对照组为 4.3±12.5(中位数 0,0-75)(p=0.14)。研究组中,23 名(67.6%)患者愿意交换时间,平均 158±180 秒(中位数 120 秒,45-900)。患者对该工具的满意度较高,平均得分为 10 分中的 9.1±1.3(中位数 9.7,5.0-10)。

结论

白内障相关知识总体较好,研究组得分略高。两组患者的决策信心均较高,术后后悔率较低。研究组有稍高的决策信心和较低的后悔倾向,但这些差异无统计学意义。在大容量白内障门诊环境中,额外使用交互式计算机工具可能有助于知情同意过程。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04975126。回顾性注册 - 2021 年 7 月 23 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb3/9650904/2c8ee40a0f2c/12886_2022_2652_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验