Suppr超能文献

机器人手术在早期和晚期卵巢癌中的应用:手术分期和间隔减瘤手术的病例选择。

Robotic surgery in early and advanced ovarian cancer: Case selection for surgical staging and interval debulking surgery.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital Bruges, Bruges, Belgium.

Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital Bruges, Bruges, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jan;280:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

During the last decade several case series have been published on robotic surgery in early and advanced stage ovarian cancer. Although most studies lack a significant oncological follow-up, more importantly criteria for patient selection for both robotic surgical staging (R-SS) and robotic interval debulking surgery (R-IDS) are not well defined. The objective of this study was to assess the surgical and oncological outcomes, using well-defined selection criteria, between robotic and open surgery in early and advanced stage ovarian cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective case cohort study including 96 ovarian cancer patients. For early stage ovarian cancer, patients were selected for R-SS after laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy of a suspicious adnexal mass. For advanced stage ovarian cancer, only patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the presence of residual peritoneal disease after NACT and/or patients requiring additional complex surgical procedures.

RESULTS

For early stage ovarian cancer, similar median operative times were seen between R-SS and open surgical staging (O-SS), 132 min and 120 min respectively. Pelvic/para-aortic lymph node yield was similar between R-SS and O-SS, 22/11 nodes and 18/8 nodes respectively. Surgical upstaging occurred in 11.5% in the R-SS group and in 27.6% in the O-SS group. In advanced stage ovarian cancer, the BMI was significantly higher in the R-IDS group compared to the O-IDS group (27.8 vs 23.5; p =.006). The median follow was 52 months in the R-IDS group and 31 months in the O-IDS group. Recurrent disease occurred in 42.9% of the R-IDS group and in 45% of the O-IDS group. The length of hospitalization was significantly longer in the O-SS and O-IDS group (p <.00001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with clinically early stage ovarian cancer, confirmed after laparoscopic removal of a suspicious adnexal mass, are candidates for R-SS whilst maintaining similar surgical and oncological outcome measures as O-SS. In advanced ovarian cancer, suitable candidates for R-IDS are those who receive NACT with good response and no residual peritoneal disease, especially in patients with a high BMI, but large prospective randomized trials with well-defined criteria are needed.

摘要

目的

在过去的十年中,已经发表了几篇关于机器人手术在早期和晚期卵巢癌中的应用的病例系列研究。尽管大多数研究缺乏显著的肿瘤学随访,但更重要的是,机器人手术分期(R-SS)和机器人间隔减瘤术(R-IDS)的患者选择标准尚未明确界定。本研究的目的是评估使用明确选择标准的早期和晚期卵巢癌中机器人手术与开放手术的手术和肿瘤学结果。

研究设计

单中心回顾性病例队列研究,共纳入 96 例卵巢癌患者。对于早期卵巢癌,患者在腹腔镜可疑附件肿块切除术后选择 R-SS。对于晚期卵巢癌,只有接受新辅助化疗和 IDS 的患者被纳入研究。排除标准为 NACT 后存在残余腹膜疾病和/或需要额外复杂手术的患者。

结果

对于早期卵巢癌,R-SS 和开放手术分期(O-SS)的中位手术时间相似,分别为 132 分钟和 120 分钟。R-SS 和 O-SS 的盆腔/主动脉旁淋巴结收获量相似,分别为 22/11 个和 18/8 个。R-SS 组中有 11.5%的患者发生手术分期升级,O-SS 组中有 27.6%的患者发生手术分期升级。在晚期卵巢癌中,R-IDS 组的 BMI 明显高于 O-IDS 组(27.8 与 23.5;p=0.006)。R-IDS 组的中位随访时间为 52 个月,O-IDS 组为 31 个月。R-IDS 组有 42.9%的患者复发,O-IDS 组有 45%的患者复发。O-SS 和 O-IDS 组的住院时间明显较长(p<.00001)。

结论

对于经腹腔镜切除可疑附件肿块后临床诊断为早期卵巢癌的患者,可选择 R-SS,同时保持与 O-SS 相似的手术和肿瘤学结果。在晚期卵巢癌中,适合接受 R-IDS 的患者是那些接受新辅助化疗且反应良好且无残余腹膜疾病的患者,尤其是 BMI 较高的患者,但需要进行大型前瞻性随机试验并制定明确的标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验