Ding Wern Yew, Proietti Marco, Romiti Giulio Francesco, Vitolo Marco, Fawzy Ameenathul Mazaya, Boriani Giuseppe, Marin Francisco, Blomström-Lundqvist Carina, Potpara Tatjana S, Fauchier Laurent, H Lip Gregory Y
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Division of Subacute Care, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Jan;107:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
Effects of Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) adherence among high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF) subgroups remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the impact of ABC adherence on clinical outcomes in these high-risk patients.
EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry is a prospective, observational registry from 250 centres across 27 European countries. High-risk patients were defined as those with either CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m), elderly patients (≥75 years) or prior thromboembolism. Primary outcome was a composite event of all-cause death, thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome.
6646 patients with AF were screened (median age was 70 [IQR 61 - 77] years; 40.2% females). There were 3304 (54.2%) patients with either CKD (n = 1750), older age (n = 2236) or prior thromboembolism (n = 728). Among these, 924 (28.0%) were managed as adherent to ABC. At 2-year follow-up, 966 (14.5%) patients reported the primary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was significantly lower in high-risk patients managed as adherent to ABC pathway (IRR 0.53 [95%CI, 0.43 - 0.64]). Consistent results were obtained in the individual subgroups. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, ABC adherence in the high-risk cohort was independently associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (aHR 0.64 [95%CI, 0.51 - 0.80]), as well as in the CKD (aHR 0.51 [95%CI, 0.37 - 0.70]) and elderly subgroups (aHR 0.69 [95%CI, 0.53 - 0.90]). Overall, there was greater reduction in the risk of primary outcome as more ABC criteria were fulfilled, both in the overall high-risk patients (aHR 0.39 [95%CI, 0.25 - 0.61]), as well as in the individual subgroups.
In a large, contemporary cohort of patients with AF, we demonstrate that adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant benefit among high-risk patients with either CKD, advanced age (≥75 years old) or prior thromboembolism.
房颤更佳治疗(ABC)依从性在高危房颤亚组中的作用尚不清楚。我们旨在评估ABC依从性对这些高危患者临床结局的影响。
欧洲心脏病学会房颤长期综合注册研究(EORP-AF)是一项来自27个欧洲国家250个中心的前瞻性观察性注册研究。高危患者定义为患有慢性肾脏病(估算肾小球滤过率<60 mL/min/1.73m²)、老年患者(≥75岁)或既往有血栓栓塞史的患者。主要结局是全因死亡、血栓栓塞和急性冠状动脉综合征的复合事件。
共筛查了6646例房颤患者(中位年龄为70岁[四分位间距61 - 77岁];40.2%为女性)。其中有3304例(54.2%)患者患有慢性肾脏病(n = 1750)、年龄较大(n = 2236)或既往有血栓栓塞史(n = 728)。在这些患者中,924例(28.0%)被视为依从ABC治疗。在2年随访时,966例(14.5%)患者出现主要结局。在被视为依从ABC路径管理的高危患者中,主要结局的发生率显著更低(发病率比0.53[95%置信区间,0.43 - 0.64])。在各个亚组中均获得了一致的结果。使用多变量Cox比例风险分析,高危队列中ABC依从性与主要结局风险较低独立相关(调整后风险比0.64[95%置信区间,0.51 - 0.80]),在慢性肾脏病亚组(调整后风险比0.51[95%置信区间,0.37 - 0.70])和老年亚组(调整后风险比0.69[95%置信区间,0.53 - 0.90])中也是如此。总体而言,无论是在总体高危患者中(调整后风险比0.39[95%置信区间,0.25 - 0.61])还是在各个亚组中,随着满足更多ABC标准,主要结局风险的降低幅度更大。
在一个大型当代房颤患者队列中,我们证明,对于患有慢性肾脏病、高龄(≥75岁)或既往有血栓栓塞史的高危患者,依从ABC路径具有显著益处。