School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Rocky Bay, Mosman, Australia.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3934-e3948. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14105. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
Understanding the experiences and perspectives of users of teletherapy living with a disability and working with them, offers the potential to improve its capacity to meet their requirements. Literature examining the effectiveness of interventions delivered via teletherapy often fail to explore the motivators and implementation needs of the users. The scoping review aimed to examine the research evidence addressing user perspectives of teletherapy in delivery of allied health interventions to the disability community. The Joanna Briggs scoping review protocol methodology was employed with searches completed across five databases (ProQuest, CINAHL (EBSCO), Medline (OVID), Scopus, Google Scholar) in September 2021. The search yielded a total of 1365 results, 147 progressed to full text screening and 22 articles included in thematic analysis. Findings were split into themes addressing organisational and implementation based considerations for teletherapy, and secondly the social and contextual considerations of the Target Participants. The two areas of interest were addressed under each theme some of which include resourcing and upskilling, financial, challenging the status quo, moving from hands on to coaching and the utilisation of a hybrid model of intervention delivery. Teletherapy is viewed as creating a distinct set of benefits and challenges compared to in person service delivery, which impact individual members of the disability community differently. The scoping review identifies a strong need from recipients to trial teletherapy and experience it personally to facilitate understanding of how it can best suit an individual. More than being viewed as an alternative to in person services, teletherapy is viewed by users as better suited as a complementary service with flexibility of hybrid model opportunities valued above exclusive use of one over the other.
了解使用远程治疗的残疾用户的体验和观点,并与他们合作,有可能提高远程治疗满足他们需求的能力。研究远程治疗干预措施效果的文献往往未能探讨用户的动机和实施需求。本范围综述旨在检查解决残疾社区中联合健康干预措施通过远程治疗提供的用户观点的研究证据。采用乔安娜·布里格斯范围综述方案方法,于 2021 年 9 月在五个数据库(ProQuest、CINAHL(EBSCO)、Medline(OVID)、Scopus、Google Scholar)中完成了搜索。搜索共产生了 1365 项结果,其中 147 项进展到全文筛选,22 篇文章纳入主题分析。研究结果分为两个主题,分别是针对远程治疗的组织和实施方面的考虑,以及其次是目标参与者的社会和背景方面的考虑。每个主题下都涉及了一些感兴趣的领域,包括资源和技能提升、财务、挑战现状、从实践到指导的转变以及混合干预交付模式的利用。与面对面服务相比,远程治疗被视为具有独特的一系列优势和挑战,这些优势和挑战对残疾社区的个体成员产生不同的影响。范围综述确定了来自接受者强烈的尝试远程治疗并亲自体验它的需求,以促进理解它如何最适合个人。远程治疗不仅被视为面对面服务的替代方案,用户还认为它更适合作为一种补充服务,混合模式的灵活性比其他模式更有价值。