Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Medical Ethics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Nov 14;38(1):e82. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322003257.
Treatment seeking for gender dysphoria (GD) has increased manifold in western countries. This has led to increased interest on evidence-base of treatments, but also discussions related to human rights, identity politics, gender-related structures, and medicalization. Combining these discourses into coherent health policy is difficult. Health technology assessment (HTA) is the golden standard for assessing whether a medical intervention should be included in a health system. A comprehensive HTA should include medical, safety, and cost-utility perspectives, but often also ethical, societal, organizational, and legal concerns. Still, ethics is often omitted in practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how integrated ethical analysis influenced a HTA of complex and controversial topics like GD.
A HTA of medical treatments of GD was conducted using integrated ethical analysis based on the EUnetHTA-model. This integrates ethical thinking into the whole HTA, explicitly analyses ethical topics, and balances arguments using several ethical theories.
Integrating ethics had a significant impact on the HTA process and recommendations. It influenced how the HTA was planned and executed, emphasized autonomy and justice when creating the recommendations, and helped the workgroup to understand the complexity of combining different stakeholders' discourses. Tensions between scientific evidence, expectations, and values became explicit.
Comprehensive HTA provides an important, integrative approach to considering complex and controversial topics in health systems. HTA emphasizes multidisciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach but simultaneously forces a pragmatic, results-oriented, and evidence-based approach on all argumentation. Ethical analysis can facilitate interactions between stakeholders, bridge different discourses, and help formulate widely acceptable guidelines and policy decisions.
在西方国家,寻求性别认同障碍(GD)的治疗方法已经大大增加。这导致人们对治疗方法的证据基础产生了更多的兴趣,但也引发了与人权、身份政治、性别相关结构和医学化相关的讨论。将这些论述结合起来形成连贯的卫生政策是困难的。卫生技术评估(HTA)是评估医疗干预措施是否应纳入卫生系统的黄金标准。全面的 HTA 应包括医疗、安全和成本效益观点,但通常还包括伦理、社会、组织和法律方面的考虑。尽管如此,实践中往往忽略了伦理问题。本文旨在展示综合伦理分析如何影响对 GD 等复杂和有争议主题的 HTA。
使用基于 EUnetHTA 模型的综合伦理分析对 GD 的医疗治疗进行了 HTA。这将伦理思维融入整个 HTA 中,明确分析伦理主题,并使用几种伦理理论平衡论点。
将伦理学纳入其中对 HTA 过程和建议产生了重大影响。它影响了 HTA 的计划和执行方式,在制定建议时强调了自主性和公正性,并帮助工作组理解将不同利益相关者的论述结合起来的复杂性。科学证据、期望和价值观之间的紧张关系变得明显。
全面的 HTA 为在卫生系统中考虑复杂和有争议的问题提供了重要的综合方法。HTA 强调多学科和多利益相关者的方法,但同时迫使所有论证采取务实、注重结果和基于证据的方法。伦理分析可以促进利益相关者之间的互动,弥合不同的论述,并帮助制定广泛可接受的准则和政策决策。