• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年腰椎小关节源性疼痛的射频神经消融术:一项随机对照前瞻性试验。

Radiofrequency Denervation on Lumbar Facet Joint Pain in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Trial.

机构信息

University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

National Pain Management and Research Center, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2022 Nov;25(8):569-576.

PMID:36375186
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar facet joint (LFJ) pain is the most common cause of low back pain in the elderly. Denervation of the medial branch of the spinal dorsal ramus can theoretically achieve long-term pain relief. Yet there is little evidence of high-level prospective randomized controlled research.

OBJECTIVES

To observe the effect of radiofrequency (RF) denervation of the medial branch of the spinal dorsal ramus on LFJ pain in the elderly.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled study.

SETTING

The study was performed in the National Pain Management and Research Center of China-Japan Friendship Hospital.

METHODS

A total of 270 patients over 60 years old with LFJ pain were randomly divided into an RF group (n = 135) and a control group (n = 135). They received radiofrequency denervation intervention and a conventional conservative approach, respectively. The follow-up was 6 months. The main outcome was the NRS pain score (0-10 points) and the proportion of patients with a pain reduction of more than 2 points (minimum difference of clinically significant difference). The secondary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the proportion of patients whose ODI decreased by more than 15 points, and the Macnab standard efficacy evaluation. The factors that influenced the excellent and good Macnab rates were analyzed by univariate and multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were more women than men who suffered from LFJ (171/99) pain based in these 270 patients. The numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score changes in the RF group were significantly different from those in the control group at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months (-2.3 vs -1.2, -2.0 vs -1.2, -2.0 vs -1.1, P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients whose NRS decreased by ? 2 was higher than that in the control group at the 3rd and 6th months (61.1% vs 26.0%, 52.9% vs 22.5%, P < 0.001). The ODI score changes in the RF group were significantly different from that in the control group at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months (-15.2 vs -10.1, -14.6 vs -8.6, -13.6 vs -7.7, P < 0.001), and the proportion of ODI reduction ? 15 was also higher than that in the control group at the 3rd and 6th months (45.8% vs 34.1%, 36.4% vs 27.0%, P < 0.05). The excellent rate and efficiency of the Macnab evaluation in the RF group at the 6th month was significantly higher compared to the control group (60.3% vs 36.0%, 81.0% vs 54.1%, P < 0.001). The independent factor affecting the excellent and good rate is failed back surgery syndrome.

LIMITATION

The limitation of this study is that it was only performed in one unit of the National Pain Management and Research Center. It needs to be further carried on in multiple centers in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency denervation can effectively reduce LFJ pain and improve movement disorder. The effect is good until 6 months later.

摘要

背景

腰椎小关节(LFJ)疼痛是老年人腰痛最常见的原因。脊神经后支内侧支的去神经支配在理论上可以实现长期的疼痛缓解。然而,几乎没有高水平前瞻性随机对照研究的证据。

目的

观察射频(RF)脊神经后支内侧支去神经支配治疗老年腰椎小关节疼痛的效果。

研究设计

前瞻性随机对照研究。

设置

研究在中国-日本友好医院国家疼痛管理与研究中心进行。

方法

将 270 名年龄在 60 岁以上的 LFJ 疼痛患者随机分为 RF 组(n=135)和对照组(n=135)。他们分别接受射频神经阻断干预和常规保守治疗。随访时间为 6 个月。主要结果是 NRS 疼痛评分(0-10 分)和疼痛减轻超过 2 分的患者比例(最小临床显著差异的差异)。次要结果是 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、ODI 降低超过 15 分的患者比例和 Macnab 标准疗效评估。通过单变量和多变量回归分析,分析影响 Macnab 优良率的因素。

结果

在这 270 名患者中,有 171 名女性(99 名男性)患有 LFJ 疼痛。RF 组的 NRS 疼痛评分变化在第 1、3 和 6 个月时与对照组有显著差异(-2.3 与-1.2、-2.0 与-1.2、-2.0 与-1.1,P<0.001),且第 3 和 6 个月时 NRS 降低超过 2 分的患者比例高于对照组(61.1%与 26.0%、52.9%与 22.5%,P<0.001)。RF 组的 ODI 评分变化在第 1、3 和 6 个月时与对照组有显著差异(-15.2 与-10.1、-14.6 与-8.6、-13.6 与-7.7,P<0.001),且第 3 和 6 个月时 ODI 降低超过 15 分的患者比例高于对照组(45.8%与 34.1%、36.4%与 27.0%,P<0.05)。在第 6 个月时,RF 组的 Macnab 评估的优良率和有效率明显高于对照组(60.3%与 36.0%、81.0%与 54.1%,P<0.001)。影响优良率的独立因素是失败的腰椎后路手术综合征。

局限性

本研究的局限性在于仅在中国-日本友好医院国家疼痛管理与研究中心的一个单位进行。未来需要在多个中心进一步开展。

结论

射频去神经支配可以有效减轻腰椎小关节疼痛,改善运动障碍。效果持续至 6 个月后。

相似文献

1
Radiofrequency Denervation on Lumbar Facet Joint Pain in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Trial.老年腰椎小关节源性疼痛的射频神经消融术:一项随机对照前瞻性试验。
Pain Physician. 2022 Nov;25(8):569-576.
2
A comparison of pulsed radiofrequency and radiofrequency denervation for lumbar facet joint pain.脉冲射频与射频热凝术治疗腰椎小关节疼痛的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 May 5;18(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03814-5.
3
Equivalent Outcomes of Lumbar Therapeutic Facet Joint Nerve Blocks and Radiofrequency Neurotomy: Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Utility.腰椎治疗关节突关节神经阻滞与射频神经切断术的等效疗效:临床疗效和成本效用的比较评估。
Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):179-192.
4
The efficacy of conventional radiofrequency denervation in patients with chronic low back pain originating from the facet joints: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.常规射频神经热凝术治疗源于关节突关节的慢性下腰痛患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1770-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Cooled-radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of chronic lumbar facet (zygapophyseal) joint pain: A retrospective study.射频冷凝术治疗慢性腰椎小关节(椎间关节)痛:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 30;100(52):e28459. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028459.
6
Endoscopic rhizotomy for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain.经皮内镜下腰椎关节突关节松解术治疗慢性腰椎关节突关节源性疼痛。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jan 3;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1533-y.
7
Percutaneous radiofrequency facet capsule denervation as an alternative target in lumbar facet syndrome.经皮射频小关节囊去神经术作为腰椎小关节综合征的替代靶点
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;150:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Comparison of intra-articular lumbar facet joint pulsed radiofrequency and intra-articular lumbar facet joint corticosteroid injection for management of lumbar facet joint pain: A randomized controlled trial.关节内腰椎小关节脉冲射频与关节内腰椎小关节皮质类固醇注射治疗腰椎小关节疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(13):e6524. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006524.
9
Pain-Free Survival After Endoscopic Rhizotomy Versus Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Real-World Comparison Study.内镜下脊神经根切断术与射频治疗腰椎小关节疼痛的无痛苦生存比较:一项真实世界的比较研究。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E87-E94.
10
An investigation on the effect of improved X-rays-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation denervation on lumbar facet joint syndrome.改良X线引导下射频热凝去神经术治疗腰椎小关节综合征的疗效观察
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;148:115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Sarcopenia on the Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for Lumbar Facet Arthropathy in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older: A Retrospective Analysis.肌肉减少症对60岁及以上患者腰椎小关节病内侧支神经射频消融术疗效的影响:一项回顾性分析
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):344. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080344.
2
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Sedoanalgesia for Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Ablation.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于腰椎小关节射频消融术镇静镇痛的比较
Clin J Pain. 2025 Aug 1;41(8):e1298. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001298.
3
Unveiling MiR-3085-3p as a modulator of cartilage degeneration in facet joint osteoarthritis: A novel therapeutic target.
揭示MiR-3085-3p作为小关节骨关节炎软骨退变的调节因子:一个新的治疗靶点。
J Orthop Translat. 2025 Jan 20;50:235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.11.007. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Radiofrequency Techniques for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: Combined with Anatomy.不同射频技术治疗腰椎小关节疼痛的疗效比较:结合解剖学。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Jul;28(7):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01241-7. Epub 2024 Mar 25.