• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中治疗月经过多的医疗方法:来自 ECLIPSE 试验的 10 年数据。

Medical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding in primary care: 10-year data from the ECLIPSE trial.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Nov 24;72(725):e857-e864. doi: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0260. Print 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp.2022.0260
PMID:36376071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9710803/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem that can significantly affect women's lives. There is a lack of evidence on long-term outcomes after seeking treatment.

AIM

To assess continuation rates of medical treatments and rates of surgery in women 10 years after initial management for HMB in primary care.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a prospective observational cohort study.

METHOD

Women with HMB who participated in the ECLIPSE primary care trial (ISRCTN86566246) completed questionnaires 10 years after randomisation to the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or other usual medical treatments (oral tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, combined oestrogen-progestogen; or progesterone alone). Outcomes were rates of surgery, medical treatments, and quality of life using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and EuroQoL EQ-5D.

RESULTS

The responding cohort of 206 women was demographically and clinically representative of the original trial population. Mean age at baseline was 41.9 years (SD 4.9) and 53.7 years (SD 5.1) at follow-up. Over the 10-year follow-up, 60 of 206 (29.1%) women had surgery (hysterectomy = 34, 16.5%; endometrial ablation = 26, 12.6%). Between 5 and 10 years, 89 women (43.2%) ceased all medical treatments and 88 (42.7%) used LNG-IUS alone or in combination with other treatments. Fifty-six women (27.2%) were using LNG-IUS at 10 years. There were improvements over time in quality-of-life scores, with no evidence of differences in these or other outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Medical treatments for women with HMB can be successfully initiated in primary care, with low rates of surgery and improvement in quality of life observed a decade later.

摘要

背景

月经过多(HMB)是一种常见的问题,会严重影响女性的生活。关于治疗后长期结果的证据不足。

目的

评估初级保健中 HMB 初始治疗 10 年后,女性继续接受药物治疗和手术治疗的比率。

设计和设置

这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。

方法

参加 ECLIPSE 初级保健试验(ISRCTN86566246)的 HMB 女性在随机分配到左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)或其他常用药物治疗(口服氨甲环酸、甲芬那酸、雌孕激素联合治疗;或单独孕激素治疗)后 10 年完成问卷调查。使用 36 项简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)评估手术、药物治疗和生活质量的比率。

结果

206 名回复问卷的女性在人口统计学和临床方面与原始试验人群具有代表性。基线时的平均年龄为 41.9 岁(SD 4.9),随访时为 53.7 岁(SD 5.1)。在 10 年的随访期间,206 名女性中有 60 名(29.1%)接受了手术(子宫切除术 34 例,16.5%;子宫内膜消融术 26 例,12.6%)。在 5 到 10 年间,89 名女性(43.2%)停止了所有药物治疗,88 名女性(42.7%)单独或联合使用 LNG-IUS。56 名女性(27.2%)在 10 年后仍在使用 LNG-IUS。生活质量评分随时间有所提高,两组之间在这些或其他结果方面没有差异。

结论

在初级保健中可以成功地为 HMB 女性启动药物治疗,手术率较低,10 年后生活质量得到改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6f/9710803/be79ac86a7aa/bjgpdec-2022-72-725-e857-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6f/9710803/b5f3725b0f77/bjgpdec-2022-72-725-e857-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6f/9710803/be79ac86a7aa/bjgpdec-2022-72-725-e857-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6f/9710803/b5f3725b0f77/bjgpdec-2022-72-725-e857-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6f/9710803/be79ac86a7aa/bjgpdec-2022-72-725-e857-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Medical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding in primary care: 10-year data from the ECLIPSE trial.初级保健中治疗月经过多的医疗方法:来自 ECLIPSE 试验的 10 年数据。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Nov 24;72(725):e857-e864. doi: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0260. Print 2022 Dec.
2
Rates of medical or surgical treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: the ECLIPSE trial 10-year observational follow-up study.患有月经过多的女性接受医学或手术治疗的比率:ECLIPSE 试验 10 年观察性随访研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Oct;27(17):1-50. doi: 10.3310/JHSW0174.
3
A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in primary care against standard treatment for menorrhagia: the ECLIPSE trial.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统在基层医疗中治疗月经过多的临床疗效和成本效益的随机对照试验:ECLIPSE试验
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(88):i-xxv, 1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta19880.
4
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的孕激素或释放孕激素的宫内节育系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub3.
5
Progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.含孕激素的宫内节育系统用于治疗月经过多。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 12;6(6):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub4.
6
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的孕激素或释放孕激素的宫内节育系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub2.
7
Usual medical treatments or levonorgestrel-IUS for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: long-term randomised pragmatic trial in primary care.月经过多女性的常规医学治疗或左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统:初级保健中的长期随机实用试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e861-e870. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687577. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
8
Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的周期性孕激素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 14;8(8):CD001016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001016.pub3.
9
Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial.子宫内膜消融术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与单纯子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多妇女的多中心随机对照研究方案; MIRA2 试验。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6.
10
Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.干预重度月经过多;Cochrane 综述和网络荟萃分析概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 31;5(5):CD013180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013180.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying menorrhagia and overview of nonsurgical management of heavy menstrual bleeding.月经过多的量化及月经过多非手术治疗概述
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):367-375. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000661.
2
Preoperative diagnosis and management of inherited bleeding disorders in female adolescents and adults.女性青少年和成年患者遗传性出血性疾病的术前诊断和处理。
Can J Surg. 2023 May 2;66(3):E246-E263. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005922. Print 2023 May-Jun.
3
Women's experiences of heavy menstrual bleeding and medical treatment: a qualitative study in primary care.

本文引用的文献

1
Decline in Danish use of oral tranexamic acid with increasing use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a nationwide drug utilization study.口服氨甲环酸的使用在丹麦逐渐减少,而左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统的使用却在增加:一项全国性的药物利用研究。
Contraception. 2020 May;101(5):321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.013. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
2
Incidence and treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in general practice.全科医疗中月经过多的发病率及治疗
Fam Pract. 2017 Nov 16;34(6):673-678. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx050.
3
Usual medical treatments or levonorgestrel-IUS for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: long-term randomised pragmatic trial in primary care.
妇女的重度月经过多体验和治疗:初级保健中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e294-e301. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0460. Print 2023 Apr.
月经过多女性的常规医学治疗或左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统:初级保健中的长期随机实用试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e861-e870. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687577. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Quality of life and costs of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or hysterectomy in the treatment of menorrhagia: a 10-year randomized controlled trial.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统或子宫切除术治疗月经过多的生活质量和成本:一项 10 年随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):535.e1-535.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.041. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus medical therapy for menorrhagia.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与药物治疗月经过多的疗效比较。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 10;368(2):128-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204724.
6
Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.子宫切除术、子宫内膜消融术和 Mirena®治疗月经过多:临床有效性和成本效益分析的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr;15(19):iii-xvi, 1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta15190.
7
High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence.黑人和白人女性子宫平滑肌瘤的高累积发病率:超声证据。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):100-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.99.
8
Perceptions of women on the impact of menorrhagia on their health using multi-attribute utility assessment.使用多属性效用评估法对女性关于月经过多对其健康影响的认知
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov;105(11):1155-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09968.x.
9
Reconsidering menorrhagia in gynecological practice. Is a 30-year-old definition still valid?重新审视妇科临床中的月经过多。一个30年之久的定义是否仍然有效?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 May;78(1):69-72. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00275-3.
10
The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: a measure of women's sexual functioning.性活动问卷:一种衡量女性性功能的方法。
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00435972.