Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, Netherlands.
School of Public Policy, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Nov 14;28(6):58. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00402-4.
As policy innovation is essential for upscaling responsible innovation, understanding its relationship to value change(s) occurring or sought in sociotechnical systems is imperative. In this study, we ask: what are the different types of values in the policy process? And, how does value change influence policy innovation? We propose a disaggregation of values and value change based on a four-stream variant of the multiple streams framework (MSF), a conceptual lens increasingly used for explaining policy innovation in sociotechnical transitions. Specifically, we posit that the values that 'govern' problem framing, policy design, political decision making, and technological diffusion can evolve relatively independently, potentially leading to value conflict. We apply this framework to the ongoing case of the market-based economic dispatch of electricity (MBED) policy in the Indian energy transition using content analysis. We find that the MBED scheme-with its emphasis on efficiency (problem), economic principles (policy), low-cost dispatch (technology), and centralization (politics)-attempts value change in each stream. Each instance of value change is, however, widely contested, with the ensuing value conflicts resulting in significant opposition to this policy innovation. We conclude that a disaggregation of values based on the MSF can facilitate an analysis of value change and value conflict in sociotechnical transitions and lay the foundation for systematically studying the relationships among technological change, value change, and policy change.
由于政策创新对于扩大负责任的创新至关重要,因此了解其与社会技术系统中发生或寻求的价值变化之间的关系是必要的。在这项研究中,我们提出了以下问题:政策过程中有哪些不同类型的价值观?以及,价值变化如何影响政策创新?我们基于多流框架(MSF)的四流变体提出了价值观和价值变化的细分,该框架越来越多地被用于解释社会技术转型中的政策创新。具体来说,我们假设“治理”问题框架、政策设计、政治决策和技术扩散的价值观可以相对独立地演变,这可能导致价值冲突。我们将这一框架应用于印度能源转型中基于市场的经济调度(MBED)政策的持续案例,采用内容分析方法。我们发现,MBED 计划——强调效率(问题)、经济原则(政策)、低成本调度(技术)和集中化(政治)——试图在每个流中进行价值变化。然而,每次价值变化都受到广泛争议,随之而来的价值冲突导致了对这项政策创新的强烈反对。我们得出结论,基于 MSF 的价值观细分可以促进对社会技术转型中价值变化和价值冲突的分析,并为系统研究技术变革、价值变化和政策变化之间的关系奠定基础。