• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2抗原检测诊断急性SARS-CoV-2感染诊断准确性的批判性文献综述与汇总分析。

Critical literature review and pooled analysis of diagnostic accuracy of Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infections.

作者信息

Lippi Giuseppe, Nocini Riccardo, Brandon Henry M

机构信息

University of Verona, Section of Clinical Biochemistry and School of Medicine, Verona, Italy.

University of Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Biochem. 2022 Oct 15;41(4):540-548. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-36107.

DOI:10.5937/jomb0-36107
PMID:36381069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9618338/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study is aimed at reviewing and meta-analyzing the currently published data on the diagnostic accuracy of Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infections.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted in Scopus and Medline with the keywords "VITROS" AND "antigen" AND "COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" AND "immunoassay" within the search fields "TITLE" AND "ABSTRACT" AND "KEYWORDS", without no date (i.e., up to January 23, 2022) or language restrictions, aimed at detecting documents reporting the diagnostic accuracy of this SARSCoV-2 immunoassay compared with reference molecular diagnostic methods.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 studies (n=2734 samples) were finally included in our pooled analysis, four of which also provided diagnostic sensitivity in oro-and nasopharyngeal samples with high viral load. The pooled cumulative diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95%CI, 0.78-0.86) and 1.00 (95%CI, 1.00-1.00), respectively, whilst the area under the curve was 0.995 (95%CI, 0.993-0.997), the cumulative agreement 97.2% (95%CI, 96.5-97.8%), with 0.89 (95%CI, 0.86-0.91) kappa statistics, thus reflecting an almost perfect concordance with reference molecular biology techniques. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity in samples with high viral load was as high as 0.98 (95%CI, 0.96-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that the automated and high-throughput Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen test may represent a valuable surrogate of molecular testing for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infections, especially in subjects with high viral load.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在回顾和荟萃分析目前已发表的关于奥森多VITROS新型冠状病毒2抗原检测诊断急性新型冠状病毒2感染的诊断准确性的数据。

方法

在Scopus和Medline数据库中进行电子检索,检索词为“VITROS”、“抗原”、“COVID-19”或“新型冠状病毒2”以及“免疫测定”,检索字段为“标题”、“摘要”和“关键词”,无日期(即截至2022年1月23日)或语言限制,旨在检测报告该新型冠状病毒2免疫测定与参考分子诊断方法相比诊断准确性的文献。

结果

总体而言,5项研究(n = 2734个样本)最终纳入我们的汇总分析,其中4项研究还提供了高病毒载量的口咽和鼻咽样本的诊断敏感性。汇总的累积诊断敏感性和特异性分别为0.82(95%CI,0.78 - 0.86)和1.00(95%CI,1.00 - 1.00),而曲线下面积为0.995(95%CI,0.993 - 0.997),累积一致性为97.2%(95%CI,96.5 - 97.8%),kappa统计量为0.89(95%CI,0.86 - 0.91),因此反映出与参考分子生物学技术几乎完美的一致性。高病毒载量样本中的汇总诊断敏感性高达0.98(95%CI,0.96 - 0.99)。

结论

这些结果证实,自动化且高通量的奥森多VITROS新型冠状病毒2抗原检测可能是诊断急性新型冠状病毒2感染的分子检测有价值的替代方法,尤其是在病毒载量高的受试者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dbb/9618338/7bcc0dc5e59b/jomb-41-4-2204540L_g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dbb/9618338/8dff3c66c6b9/jomb-41-4-2204540L_g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dbb/9618338/7bcc0dc5e59b/jomb-41-4-2204540L_g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dbb/9618338/8dff3c66c6b9/jomb-41-4-2204540L_g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dbb/9618338/7bcc0dc5e59b/jomb-41-4-2204540L_g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Critical literature review and pooled analysis of diagnostic accuracy of Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infections.关于Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2抗原检测诊断急性SARS-CoV-2感染诊断准确性的批判性文献综述与汇总分析。
J Med Biochem. 2022 Oct 15;41(4):540-548. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-36107.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (CoV2Ag) chemiluminescent immunoassay for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infection: a pooled analysis.西门子 SARS-CoV-2 抗原(CoV2Ag)化学发光免疫分析诊断急性 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断准确性:汇总分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jan 12;61(7):1133-1139. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1287. Print 2023 Jun 27.
3
Diagnostic performance of the fully automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay: a pooled analysis.罗氏 Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 抗原电化学发光免疫分析全自动检测的诊断性能:汇总分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Feb 3;60(5):655-661. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0053. Print 2022 Apr 26.
4
LumiraDX SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test for Diagnosing Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Critical Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.用于诊断急性严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型感染的LumiraDX严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型抗原检测:关键文献综述与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;12(4):947. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040947.
5
Fujirebio Lumipulse SARS-CoV-2 antigen immunoassay: pooled analysis of diagnostic accuracy.富士瑞必欧 Lumipulse SARS-CoV-2 抗原免疫测定:诊断准确性的汇总分析。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2022 Mar 15;9(2):149-156. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0021.
6
Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy of DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Immunoassay.索林Liaison SARS-CoV-2抗原免疫测定诊断准确性的系统评价
EJIFCC. 2022 Aug 8;33(2):94-104. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Pooled analysis of diagnostic performance of the instrument-read Quidel Sofia SARS antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA).仪器读取的Quidel Sofia SARS抗原荧光免疫分析(FIA)诊断性能的汇总分析。
EJIFCC. 2023 Jul 10;34(2):123-141. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test.基于化学发光酶免疫分析的高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒用于 COVID-19 诊断的评估:VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6778-6781. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27153. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
9
FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.FebriDx 用于入院时疑似 COVID-19 患者的快速筛查:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 May;123:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
10
Association between viral load and positivization time of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in routine nasopharyngeal specimens.常规鼻咽标本中SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测的病毒载量与阳性化时间之间的关联。
J Med Biochem. 2022 Oct 15;41(4):513-517. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-35482.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy of DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Immunoassay.索林Liaison SARS-CoV-2抗原免疫测定诊断准确性的系统评价
EJIFCC. 2022 Aug 8;33(2):94-104. eCollection 2022 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of the fully automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay: a pooled analysis.罗氏 Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 抗原电化学发光免疫分析全自动检测的诊断性能:汇总分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Feb 3;60(5):655-661. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0053. Print 2022 Apr 26.
2
The Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 binds to the hACE2 receptor more strongly and escapes the antibody response: Insights from structural and simulation data.新冠病毒奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)变异株与 hACE2 受体结合更强,并逃避抗体反应:来自结构和模拟数据的见解。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2022 Mar 1;200:438-448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.059. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
Neutralizing potency of COVID-19 vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant.
新冠病毒疫苗对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)变种的中和效力。
J Med Virol. 2022 May;94(5):1799-1802. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27575. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Updated picture of SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations.SARS-CoV-2 变体和突变的最新图片。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Dec 23;9(1):11-17. doi: 10.1515/dx-2021-0149.
5
Performance of a high-throughput, automated enzyme immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, including in viral "variants of concern": Implications for clinical use.高通量、自动化酶免疫分析法检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗原的性能,包括对“关注变异株”的检测:对临床应用的影响。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Jan;146:105048. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105048. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Performance evaluation of automated chemiluminescence immunoassay based antigen detection - Moving towards more reliable ways to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection.基于自动化化学发光免疫分析的抗原检测性能评估——迈向更可靠的预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的方法。
J Virol Methods. 2021 Dec;298:114299. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114299. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
7
Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen detection tests to real time polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较快速抗原检测试验与实时聚合酶链反应在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Nov;144:104985. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104985. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Clinical Assessment of the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag Chemiluminescence Immunoassay.索林LIAISON SARS-CoV-2抗原化学发光免疫分析的临床评估
EJIFCC. 2021 Jun 29;32(2):216-223. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Evaluation of a high volume antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2.高容量抗原检测用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的评估。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Sep;142:104938. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104938. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
10
Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test.基于化学发光酶免疫分析的高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒用于 COVID-19 诊断的评估:VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6778-6781. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27153. Epub 2021 Aug 12.