Jaswal Surendra, Patil NeelKant, Singh Mohit P, Dadarwal Ashish, Sharma Vineet, Sharma Akhil K
Oral Medicine and Radiology, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, IND.
Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Rajasthan Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 8;14(10):e30070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30070. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Purpose This study evaluates the efficacy of digital radiography and ultrasound (USG) for the distinction between periapical cysts and granulomas, determines the nature and extent of the periapical lesion, visualizes the lumen of the lesion, assesses its size, content, and vascularity. Material and Methods Thirty patients, ages 18 to 40, with well-defined periapical radiolucencies on maxillary or mandibular teeth, indicated for the extraction or periapical surgery, underwent digital radiography examination using the paralleling technique, followed by USG examination. A sonologist evaluated the lesions' size, echogenicity, and vascular content. The diagnosis was compared to histopathological examinations of tissues obtained through extraction or periapical surgery. Results The diagnostic value of USG compared to the histopathological diagnosis of the periapical cyst was greater than that of the radiographic diagnosis, with an ultrasonographic diagnostic sensitivity (SN) value of 60% and a radiographic diagnostic SN value of 40%, respectively. The diagnostic value of USG imaging against the histopathological diagnosis of periapical granuloma was slightly lower than that of digital radiography, with an SN value of 72.2% for USG and 83.33% for digital radiography. However, the specificity (SP) value and precision of USG imaging were superior to those of digital radiographic diagnosis. USG imaging and radiographic diagnosis had 58.33% and 50% SP values, respectively. In cases of periapical abscess, the diagnostic values of USG against histopathological diagnosis were lower than those of radiographic diagnosis, which had an SN value of 100%. Conclusion USG with color doppler is a more effective tool than digital radiography for diagnosing periapical lesions. The echo structure of the lesions and the presence of vascularity on USG with color doppler correlated with histopathology better than the radiological diagnosis.
目的 本研究评估数字放射成像和超声(USG)在区分根尖囊肿和肉芽肿方面的有效性,确定根尖病变的性质和范围,显示病变的管腔,评估其大小、内容物和血管情况。
材料与方法 30例年龄在18至40岁之间、上颌或下颌牙齿根尖有明确透射区、拟行拔牙或根尖手术的患者,采用平行投照技术进行数字放射成像检查,随后进行USG检查。一名超声科医生评估病变的大小、回声性和血管内容物。将诊断结果与通过拔牙或根尖手术获取的组织的组织病理学检查结果进行比较。
结果 与根尖囊肿的组织病理学诊断相比,USG的诊断价值大于放射成像诊断,超声诊断敏感性(SN)值分别为60%,放射成像诊断SN值为40%。与根尖肉芽肿的组织病理学诊断相比,USG成像的诊断价值略低于数字放射成像,USG的SN值为72.2%,数字放射成像的SN值为83.33%。然而,USG成像的特异性(SP)值和准确性优于数字放射成像诊断。USG成像和放射成像诊断的SP值分别为58.33%和50%。在根尖脓肿病例中,USG相对于组织病理学诊断的诊断价值低于放射成像诊断,放射成像诊断的SN值为100%。
结论 彩色多普勒超声是一种比数字放射成像更有效的诊断根尖病变的工具。彩色多普勒超声上病变的回声结构和血管情况与组织病理学的相关性优于放射学诊断。