Rios Osorio Nestor, Jiménez Peña Oscar, Contreras Ibarra Marcela, Grajales Marggie, Fernández Grisales Rafael
Biomedical Sciences PhD Programme, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Department of Endodontics, Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia UNICOC, Bogotá, Colombia.
Eur Endod J. 2025 Mar;10(2):104-115. doi: 10.14744/eej.2024.84755.
This systematic review aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonic (US) imaging in the differential diagnosis between inflammatory radicular cysts (IRCs) and periapical granulomas (PGs) compared with the histological examination as the reference standard. Scopus, Medline (PubMed), and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 2024. The Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Thirteen cross-sectional studies published between 2003 and 2023 were included in this study. A total sample of 275 patients (one tooth / per patient) comparing ultrasound test vs. histopathological examination was assessed. The summary measures of the US imaging test were: sensitivity= 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99], specificity= 0.83 [95% CI, 0.76-0.88], LR+ = 3.498 [95% CI, 2.079-5.885], LR- = 0.091 [95% CI, 0.050-0.164], DOR = 65.848 (95% CI, 28.857-150.25) and AUC=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00). The methodological assessment was variable in all domains and studies. Approximately 90% and 70% of the studies revealed some form of risk of bias concern in the domains -flow and timing-, and -reference standard-, respectively. US imaging can be regarded as a highly accurate and consistent method for IRC vs. PG differential diagnosis. The echotexture features of periapical lesions in US images reflected their histopathological characteristics. (EEJ-2024-09-150).
本系统评价旨在评估超声(US)成像在炎性根囊肿(IRC)与根尖肉芽肿(PG)鉴别诊断中的准确性,并以组织学检查作为参考标准。检索了Scopus、Medline(PubMed)和Web of Science数据库,检索时间从建库至2024年4月。使用QUADAS-2工具评估方法学质量。本研究纳入了2003年至2023年发表的13项横断面研究。评估了275例患者(每位患者一颗牙)的超声检查与组织病理学检查的总样本。超声成像检查的汇总指标为:敏感性=0.96 [95%可信区间,0.93 - 0.99],特异性=0.83 [95%可信区间,0.76 - 0.88],阳性似然比=3.498 [95%可信区间,2.079 - 5.885],阴性似然比=0.091 [95%可信区间,0.050 - 0.164],诊断比值比=65.848(95%可信区间,28.857 - 150.25),曲线下面积=0.97(95%可信区间,0.95 - 1.00)。所有领域和研究的方法学评估存在差异。分别约90%和70%的研究在“流程和时间”以及“参考标准”领域显示出某种形式的偏倚风险。超声成像可被视为一种用于IRC与PG鉴别诊断的高度准确且一致的方法。超声图像中根尖周病变的回声纹理特征反映了其组织病理学特征。(EEJ - 2024 - 09 - 15)