Rebolledo Natalia, Bercholz Maxime, Corvalán Camila, Ng Shu Wen, Taillie Lindsey Smith
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Front Nutr. 2022 Oct 28;9:1043665. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1043665. eCollection 2022.
There has been a rapid proliferation of policies around the globe to reduce sugar consumption, yet there is little understanding as to whether these policies have led to changes in the overall sweetness of products, which is essential for understanding long-term effects on food preferences and intake. For example, the implementation of Chile's Law on Food Labeling and Advertising led to decreases in the sugar content of non-alcoholic packaged beverages and increases in non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) use in these beverages. Given that NNS have greater sweetness intensity than sugars, it is unclear what was the net effect of these changes on the sweetness of purchased beverages. Using longitudinal household purchase data ( > 2,000 households), we measured the changes in the sweetness of beverage purchases after implementing the first phase of the Chilean law and examine if there were differences by key family sociodemographic variables. We developed three sweetness indices: (1) NNS sweetness, including the sweetness of the six NNS most consumed by Chileans; (2) total sugars sweetness, including the sweetness from total sugars; and (3) total sweetness, combining the sweetness from NNS and sugars. Using fixed-effects models, we compared the observed post-law purchases to a counterfactual based on pre-law trends. We found that NNS sweetness increased relative to the counterfactual, while total sugars sweetness decreased after the law. However, the absolute changes in NNS sweetness were almost entirely offset by the decreases in total sugar sweetness, leading to no change in the total sweetness of beverage purchases. Additionally, there were no differences in the sweetness changes by family sociodemographics. Our findings indicate that Chilean consumers are exposed to similar sweetness levels in their beverages after the law. Future research should explore whether sweetness also remained consistent in dietary intake.
全球范围内旨在减少糖分摄入的政策迅速增加,但对于这些政策是否导致了产品总体甜度的变化,人们了解甚少,而这对于理解对食物偏好和摄入量的长期影响至关重要。例如,智利《食品标签和广告法》的实施导致非酒精包装饮料的糖分含量下降,且这些饮料中使用的非营养性甜味剂(NNS)有所增加。鉴于NNS的甜度强度高于糖类,目前尚不清楚这些变化对所购饮料甜度的净影响是什么。我们利用纵向家庭购买数据(超过2000户家庭),测量了智利法律第一阶段实施后饮料购买甜度的变化,并考察了关键家庭社会人口统计学变量之间是否存在差异。我们制定了三个甜度指数:(1)NNS甜度,包括智利人消费最多的六种NNS的甜度;(2)总糖甜度,包括总糖的甜度;(3)总甜度,将NNS和糖的甜度结合起来。我们使用固定效应模型,将法律实施后的实际购买情况与基于法律实施前趋势的反事实情况进行比较。我们发现,相对于反事实情况,NNS甜度有所增加,而法律实施后总糖甜度下降。然而,NNS甜度的绝对变化几乎完全被总糖甜度的下降所抵消,导致所购饮料的总甜度没有变化。此外,家庭社会人口统计学因素在甜度变化方面没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,法律实施后,智利消费者所饮用饮料的甜度水平相似。未来的研究应探讨在饮食摄入量方面甜度是否也保持一致。