Sinha Pooja, Chourey Niraj, Hiremath Ravishekar N, Ghodke Sandhya, Sharma Atul, Vaswani Pallavi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jul;11(7):3901-3904. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2042_21. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
The study has been designed to assess the knowledge of ethics amongst young students and professionals, and practices of health care ethics among medical professionals in a government teaching hospital in India.
A cross-sectional study was carried out at one of the teaching hospitals in Southern India with a sample size of 84 among fresh medical graduates, post-graduate trainees, and young consultants with work experience of 6 months to 8 years. The data were collected by means of a structured and validated questionnaire, and the questionnaire was administered before and after a lecture/seminar on ethical principles, and results were analyzed using SPSS software.
The maximum participants were in the age group of 20 to 24 years with 0-2 years of clinical experience. The basic awareness and practices before the workshop were quite less when compared to after the workshop which showed a very good improvement in the correct responses to the questions. The maximum change seen, reflected in curiosity to learn bioethics. The workshop was an eye-opener for many participants in terms of the Nuremberg Code and its origin. The ethics committee was an alien concept to many participants, and it was reflected in the response postworkshop. The students felt a strong need to discuss ethics and implement them postworkshop. The segment on attitudes in clinical practice showed an impact on autonomy and truth-telling (32% to 50%). The segment on ethical practices reflected a confused audience. The increase in sensitivity to police information, and the concept of error of judgment and negligence were positive. The fact that medical practitioners are legally bound to help accident victims showed a positive response.
Based on the assessment of pre-and post-workshop, there is a strong need to stress the ethical principles and revision of these ideas from time to time. Workshops and interactive sessions are a good way for periodic assessment and reinstatement of these values in our research and clinical practice. Thus, these should be part of the curriculum across all educational institutions for budding primary care providers and family physicians.
本研究旨在评估印度一家政府教学医院中年轻学生和专业人员的伦理知识,以及医学专业人员的医疗保健伦理实践情况。
在印度南部的一家教学医院开展了一项横断面研究,样本包括84名新医学毕业生、研究生实习生以及工作经验在6个月至8年的年轻顾问。通过一份结构化且经过验证的问卷收集数据,该问卷在关于伦理原则的讲座/研讨会前后进行发放,并使用SPSS软件对结果进行分析。
最大年龄组为20至24岁,临床经验为0至2年。与研讨会后相比,研讨会前的基本认知和实践情况相当少,后者在对问题的正确回答方面有了非常显著的改善。最大的变化体现在对学习生物伦理的好奇心方面。该研讨会让许多参与者对《纽伦堡法典》及其起源大开眼界。伦理委员会对许多参与者来说是一个陌生的概念,这在研讨会后的回答中有所体现。学生们强烈感到有必要在研讨会后讨论伦理并加以实施。临床实践中的态度部分对自主性和告知真相产生了影响(从32%提高到50%)。伦理实践部分反映出受众存在困惑。对警方信息敏感度的提高以及判断错误和疏忽的概念是积极的。医生在法律上有义务帮助事故受害者这一事实得到了积极回应。
基于对研讨会前后的评估,迫切需要强调伦理原则并定期对这些理念进行修订。研讨会和互动环节是在我们的研究和临床实践中定期评估和恢复这些价值观的好方法。因此,这些应该成为所有教育机构中初级保健提供者和家庭医生培养课程的一部分。