Pareto Lena, Ekström Sara, Serholt Sofia
Division of Media and Design, School of Business, Economics and IT, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.
Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 31;9:875704. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.875704. eCollection 2022.
Human peer tutoring is known to be effective for learning, and social robots are currently being explored for robot-assisted peer tutoring. In peer tutoring, not only the tutee but also the tutor benefit from the activity. Exploiting the learning-by-teaching mechanism, robots as tutees can be a promising approach for tutor learning. This study compares robots and humans by examining children's learning-by-teaching with a social robot and younger children, respectively. The study comprised a small-scale field experiment in a Swedish primary school, following a within-subject design. Ten sixth-grade students (age 12-13) assigned as tutors conducted two 30 min peer tutoring sessions each, one with a robot tutee and one with a third-grade student (age 9-10) as the tutee. The tutoring task consisted of teaching the tutee to play a two-player educational game designed to promote conceptual understanding and mathematical thinking. The tutoring sessions were video recorded, and verbal actions were transcribed and extended with crucial game actions and user gestures, to explore differences in interaction patterns between the two conditions. An extension to the classical initiation-response-feedback framework for classroom interactions, the IRFCE tutoring framework, was modified and used as an analytic lens. Actors, tutoring actions, and teaching interactions were examined and coded as they unfolded in the respective child-robot and child-child interactions during the sessions. Significant differences between the robot tutee and child tutee conditions regarding action frequencies and characteristics were found, concerning tutee initiatives, tutee questions, tutor explanations, tutee involvement, and evaluation feedback. We have identified ample opportunities for the tutor to learn from teaching in both conditions, for different reasons. The child tutee condition provided opportunities to engage in explanations to the tutee, experience smooth collaboration, and gain motivation through social responsibility for the younger child. The robot tutee condition provided opportunities to answer challenging questions from the tutee, receive plenty of feedback, and communicate using mathematical language. Hence, both conditions provide good learning opportunities for a tutor, but in different ways.
众所周知,同伴辅导对学习有效,目前正在探索社交机器人用于机器人辅助同伴辅导。在同伴辅导中,不仅被辅导者,辅导者也能从活动中受益。利用通过教学来学习的机制,让机器人作为被辅导者可能是一种很有前景的辅导者学习方法。本研究通过分别考察儿童与社交机器人以及年幼儿童的教学相长情况,对机器人和人类进行了比较。该研究在瑞典一所小学进行了一项小规模的现场实验,采用被试内设计。十名被指定为辅导者的六年级学生(年龄在12 - 13岁)每人进行了两次30分钟的同伴辅导课程,一次辅导机器人被辅导者,一次辅导三年级学生(年龄在9 - 10岁)作为被辅导者。辅导任务包括教被辅导者玩一款双人教育游戏,该游戏旨在促进概念理解和数学思维。辅导课程进行了视频录制,言语行为被转录,并补充了关键的游戏行为和用户手势,以探索两种情况下互动模式的差异。对用于课堂互动的经典发起 - 回应 - 反馈框架(IRFCE辅导框架)进行了修改,并用作分析视角。在课程期间,对儿童与机器人以及儿童与儿童互动中展开的参与者、辅导行为和教学互动进行了检查和编码。在被辅导者主动性、被辅导者问题、辅导者解释、被辅导者参与度和评价反馈方面,发现机器人被辅导者和儿童被辅导者情况在行动频率和特征上存在显著差异。我们发现,出于不同原因,在两种情况下辅导者都有大量通过教学来学习的机会。儿童被辅导者情况提供了向被辅导者进行解释、体验顺利协作以及通过对年幼儿童的社会责任获得动力的机会。机器人被辅导者情况提供了回答被辅导者具有挑战性问题、获得大量反馈以及使用数学语言进行交流的机会。因此,两种情况都为辅导者提供了良好的学习机会,但方式不同。