Cao Shuo, Chen Xin, Pan Shengfa, Diao Yinze, Zhao Yanbin, Xia Tian, Li Weishi, Zhou Feifei, Sun Yu
Department of Orthopaedics, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Neurospine. 2022 Dec;19(4):1071-1083. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244554.277. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
To report concave-side distraction technique to treat congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine. To evaluate and compare clinical and radiographic results of this procedure with classic hemivertebra resection procedure.
This study reviewed 29 patients in last 13 years. These patients were divided into convex-side resection group (group R) and concave-side distraction group (group D). Radiographic assessment was based on parameter changes preoperatively, postoperatively and at last follow-up. Demographic data, surgical data and complications were also evaluated and compared between the 2 groups.
In group R, mean age was 8.9 ± 3.3 years and follow-up was 46 ± 18 months. Operation time and blood loss averaged 500 ± 100 minutes, 703 ± 367 mL. In group D, mean age was 9.9 ± 2.8 years and follow-up was 34 ± 14 months. Operation time and blood loss averaged 501 ± 112 minutes, 374 ± 181 mL. Structural Cobb angle was corrected from 29.4° ± 12.5° to 5.3° (2.1°-18.1°) (p = 0.001) and 33.7° ± 14.1° to 12.8° ± 11.4° (p < 0.001) in groups R and D. Compensatory Cobb angle had a spontaneous correction rate of 59.6% (40.0%-80.8%) and 59.7% ± 23.0% in groups R and D. Mandibular incline, clavicle angle and spine coronal balance were significantly improved at last follow-up in both groups. All correction rates were not statistically different between groups. However, group D had significant less blood loss (p < 0.001) and operation time (p = 0.004) per vertebra than group R. Seven patients developed C5 nerve root palsy and recovered by 6 months of follow-up.
Both surgical procedures are safe and effective in correcting congenital cervical scoliosis. But concave-side distraction technique has less blood loss and time-consuming during surgery, which provides a better option for the treatment of congenital cervical scoliosis.
报告凹侧撑开技术治疗下颈椎及颈胸段先天性颈椎侧凸。评估并比较该手术与经典半椎体切除术的临床及影像学结果。
本研究回顾了过去13年中的29例患者。这些患者被分为凸侧切除组(R组)和凹侧撑开组(D组)。影像学评估基于术前、术后及末次随访时的参数变化。还对两组的人口统计学数据、手术数据及并发症进行了评估和比较。
R组平均年龄为8.9±3.3岁,随访时间为46±18个月。手术时间和失血量平均分别为500±100分钟、703±367毫升。D组平均年龄为9.9±2.8岁,随访时间为34±14个月。手术时间和失血量平均分别为501±112分钟、374±181毫升。R组和D组的结构性Cobb角分别从29.4°±12.5°矫正至5.3°(2.1°-18.1°)(p = 0.001)和从33.7°±14.1°矫正至12.8°±11.4°(p < 0.001)。R组和D组的代偿性Cobb角自发矫正率分别为59.6%(40.0%-80.8%)和59.7%±23.0%。两组在末次随访时下颌倾斜度、锁骨角及脊柱冠状面平衡均有显著改善。两组间所有矫正率无统计学差异。然而,D组每椎体的失血量(p < 0.001)和手术时间(p = 0.004)均显著少于R组。7例患者出现C5神经根麻痹,随访6个月时恢复。
两种手术方法在矫正先天性颈椎侧凸方面均安全有效。但凹侧撑开技术在手术过程中失血量更少且耗时更短,为先天性颈椎侧凸的治疗提供了更好的选择。