Suppr超能文献

可能会出现什么问题?非标准化与标准化食物质地分类。

What could go wrong? Non-standardized versus standardized food texture classification.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Communication Disorders, Ono Academic Collage, Kiryat Ono, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Nov;57(6):1244-1254. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12749. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Texture-modified foods (TMF) is a common intervention for improving swallowing safety and efficiency for people with dysphagia. Non-standardized texture classification (NSTC) of foods is used worldwide. However, as this study documents, it can introduce a lack of clarity and confusion over definitions that can potentially harm patients' safety. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) framework offers international terminology and standardized methods for texture testing that can address this issue AIMS: To document differences between NSTC and standardized texture classification (STC) of the IDDSI, to document changes in the STC in the 30 min following meal delivery, and to explore the relationship between food intake and texture level.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: In this observational study, data were collected from 24 long-term care departments during five meals served to 624 residents, including at least one breakfast, lunch and dinner. To document differences between NSTC and STC, all NSTC food textures used in the LTC facilities were reclassified to match the IDDSI texture level at the time food left the kitchen (n = 1276). To document time-related changes in texture, the STC texture as food left the kitchen was compared with texture 30 min later (n = 1276). Finally, to explore the relationship between texture and consumption, estimates were made of single-item food consumption (n = 3820) using a subjective evaluation of consumption percentage OUTCOMES & RESULTS: A total of 1276 food items were classified over the course of five meal services (with at least one each from breakfast, lunch and dinner). Statistically significant differences in NSTC and STC texture levels were found that revealed that residents were consuming food that was more difficult to eat than intended by the TMF prescription. In addition, significant changes in food texture were found over time, with texture levels significantly increasing 30 min after food left the kitchen. Finally, greater consumption was found for softer textures in comparison with regular foods; moreover, food consumption was greatest during breakfast and lowest during lunch.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Residents requiring TMF received harder textures than intended which required complex swallowing ability, thus introducing a choking risk. Using the STC as proposed by the IDDSI could improve patient safety, oral intake and nutritional status. Time-related changes should also be considered in circumstances where patients do not consume food soon after service. Lastly, reduced food consumption during lunch might negatively impact overall nutrient intake, particularly in cultures where lunch is the main meal of the day.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Despite widespread agreement on the importance of STC, institutional care providers widely use NSTC. The IDDSI framework offers international terminology and standardized methods for texture testing. The clinical importance of using STC is not well understood. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study found that residents who required texture-modified foods were eating food textures that were more challenging to swallow than intended. Differences were found in food texture between when it left the kitchen compared with texture 30 min later. Pureed texture had greater consumption than regular textured food. Food consumption was found to be the highest during breakfast, and reduced during lunch, which might negatively impact overall nutrient intake. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Accurate food texture prescription is the first step towards increasing patients' safety. However, food preparation and handling are also very important steps, not to be disregarded. Time-related changes in food texture are remarkable and should be considered in circumstances where patients do not consume food soon after service, as these can compromise patients' safety.

摘要

背景

质地改良食品(TMF)是改善吞咽障碍患者吞咽安全性和效率的常用干预措施。全世界都在使用非标准化质地分类(NSTC)的食物。然而,正如本研究所记录的那样,它可能会导致定义不明确和混淆,从而潜在地危害患者的安全。国际吞咽障碍饮食标准化倡议(IDDSI)框架提供了国际术语和标准化的质地测试方法,可以解决这个问题。目的:记录 NSTC 与 IDDSI 标准化质地分类(STC)之间的差异,记录送餐后 30 分钟内 STC 的变化,并探讨食物摄入量与质地水平之间的关系。

方法和程序

在这项观察性研究中,从 24 个长期护理部门的五顿饭中收集了 624 名居民的数据,包括至少一顿早餐、午餐和晚餐。为了记录 NSTC 和 STC 之间的差异,在食物离开厨房时,对长期护理机构使用的所有 NSTC 食物质地进行了重新分类,以匹配 IDDSI 质地级别(n=1276)。为了记录质地随时间的变化,比较了食物离开厨房时的 STC 质地与 30 分钟后的质地(n=1276)。最后,为了探索质地与消耗之间的关系,使用主观消耗百分比评估对单个食物项目的消耗进行了估计(n=3820)。

结果和结论

在五次膳食服务期间共对 1276 种食物进行了分类(至少有一次来自早餐、午餐和晚餐)。发现 NSTC 和 STC 质地水平存在统计学差异,这表明居民正在食用比 TMF 处方预期更难食用的食物。此外,随着时间的推移,食物质地发生了显著变化,食物离开厨房 30 分钟后质地水平显著增加。最后,与常规食物相比,较软的质地消耗更大;此外,早餐时的消耗最大,午餐时的消耗最低。

结论和意义

需要 TMF 的居民接受的质地比预期的更硬,这需要复杂的吞咽能力,因此存在窒息风险。使用 IDDSI 提出的 STC 可以提高患者安全性、口服摄入量和营养状况。在患者不能在服务后不久进食的情况下,还应考虑与时间相关的变化。最后,午餐时食物摄入量减少可能会对整体营养摄入产生负面影响,尤其是在午餐是一天中主要餐食的文化中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2af/9796710/2ed955676c86/JLCD-57-1244-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验