Davies S P, Kassab J Y, Thrush A J, Smith P H
J Adv Nurs. 1986 Sep;11(5):535-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1986.tb01285.x.
A primarily clinical trial has been undertaken to investigate and compare the use of mercury and digital thermometers in a ward situation. Both laboratory and clinical studies show that there is no significant difference in the average accuracy of the two types of thermometers, however there is a greater fluctuation of readings of temperature when using electronic thermometers. In clinical studies between 9 and 23% of repeated measurements using an electronic thermometer differ by 0.5 degrees C or more whilst the corresponding range for mercury thermometers is 0.6%. It is also shown that when making clinical measurements with mercury thermometers there is no clinical advantage in using a measurement time longer than 3 minutes.
已开展一项主要的临床试验,以研究和比较在病房环境中使用水银体温计和数字体温计的情况。实验室和临床研究均表明,这两种类型体温计的平均准确度没有显著差异,然而,使用电子体温计时温度读数的波动更大。在临床研究中,使用电子体温计进行的重复测量中有9%至23%的测量值相差0.5摄氏度或更多,而水银体温计的相应范围为0.6%。研究还表明,用水银体温计进行临床测量时,测量时间超过3分钟并无临床优势。