Lou Lingyun, Huang Xiu, Tu Junwei, Xu Zhihao
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2023 Feb;40(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s10585-022-10190-7. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains a challenge for physicians. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been applied in the diagnosis of PPLs, but its diagnostic rate varies widely. The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to figure out the accuracy and safety of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of PPLs. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for relevant studies published from January 1, 2000 to December 30, 2021 and used PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) to worked out the diagnostic rate of EBUS-TBNA in PPLs. Two reviewers independently performed the data extraction and assessed study quality. Statistical analysis was carried out via R software. In 7 studies of totally 510 patients of PPLs, the overall EBUS-TBNA diagnosis yield is 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.84) by the random effect model. EBUS-TBNA showed a higher accuracy of 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.74) compared to 0.46 (95% CI 0.19-0.72) of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) when EBUS probe is adjacent to lesions. In the case of malignant lesions, the diagnostic rate of EBUS-TBNA is 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.88). Combined EBUS-TBNA with conventional bronchoscopy procedures showed the highest diagnostic yield (0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87)). Collectively, EBUS-TBNA should be performed firstly in patients with PPLs suspected to lung cancer especially when the EBUS probe was adjacent to the lesions. No serious procedure-related complications were observed.
外周肺部病变(PPLs)的诊断对医生来说仍然是一项挑战。支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)已应用于PPLs的诊断,但其诊断率差异很大。进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以明确EBUS-TBNA在PPLs诊断中的准确性和安全性。我们在PubMed和Embase数据库中检索了2000年1月1日至2021年12月30日发表的相关研究,并使用PICO(参与者、干预措施、对照和结局)来计算EBUS-TBNA在PPLs中的诊断率。两名研究者独立进行数据提取并评估研究质量。通过R软件进行统计分析。在总共510例PPLs患者的7项研究中,随机效应模型显示EBUS-TBNA的总体诊断率为0.75(95%CI 0.67-0.84)。当EBUS探头靠近病变时,与支气管内超声引导下经支气管活检术(EBUS-TBB)的0.46(95%CI 0.19-0.72)相比,EBUS-TBNA显示出更高的准确性,为0.64(95%CI 0.53-0.74)。在恶性病变的情况下,EBUS-TBNA的诊断率为0.79(95%CI 0.72-0.88)。EBUS-TBNA与传统支气管镜检查程序相结合显示出最高的诊断率(0.83(95%CI 0.79-0.87))。总体而言,对于怀疑患有肺癌的PPLs患者,尤其是当EBUS探头靠近病变时,应首先进行EBUS-TBNA。未观察到严重的与操作相关的并发症。