Nishida Kazuki, Ito Takayasu, Iwano Shingo, Okachi Shotaro, Nakamura Shota, Chrétien Basile, Chen-Yoshikawa Toyofumi Fengshi, Ishii Makoto
Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Biostatistics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 May 26;25(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03725-7.
Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) findings obtained via transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA)/biopsy (TBB) with endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are lacking. We evaluated whether intraoperative probe repositioning improves R-EBUS imaging and affects diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-guided sampling for PPLs.
We retrospectively studied 363 patients with PPLs who underwent TBNA/TBB (83 lesions) or TBB (280 lesions) using EBUS-GS. Based on the R-EBUS findings before and after these procedures, patients were categorized into three groups: the improved R-EBUS image (n = 52), unimproved R-EBUS image (n = 69), and initial within-lesion groups (n = 242). The impact of improved R-EBUS findings on diagnostic yield and complications was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for lesion size, lesion location, and the presence of a bronchus leading to the lesion on CT. A separate exploratory random-forest model with SHAP analysis was used to explore factors associated with successful repositioning in lesions not initially "within."
The diagnostic yield in the improved R-EBUS group was significantly higher than that in the unimproved R-EBUS group (76.9% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.001). The regression model revealed that the improvement in intraoperative R-EBUS findings was associated with a high diagnostic yield (odds ratio: 3.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.57-8.06, p = 0.002). Machine learning analysis indicated that inner lesion location and radiographic visibility were the most influential predictors of successful repositioning. The complication rates were similar across all groups (total complications: 5.8% vs. 4.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.943).
Improved R-EBUS findings during TBNA/TBB or TBB with EBUS-GS were associated with a high diagnostic yield without an increase in complications, even when the initial R-EBUS findings were inadequate. This suggests that repeated intraoperative probe repositioning can safely boost outcomes.
缺乏关于经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)/活检(TBB)联合超声支气管镜引导鞘(EBUS-GS)获取的径向支气管内超声(R-EBUS)检查结果对周围型肺病变(PPL)的诊断效能的数据。我们评估了术中探头重新定位是否能改善R-EBUS成像,并影响EBUS引导下PPL采样的诊断率和安全性。
我们回顾性研究了363例接受TBNA/TBB(83个病变)或TBB(280个病变)的PPL患者,使用EBUS-GS。根据这些操作前后的R-EBUS检查结果,将患者分为三组:R-EBUS图像改善组(n = 52)、R-EBUS图像未改善组(n = 69)和初始病变内组(n = 242)。使用多变量逻辑回归评估R-EBUS检查结果改善对诊断率和并发症的影响,并对病变大小、病变位置以及CT上通向病变的支气管的存在情况进行调整。使用带有SHAP分析的单独探索性随机森林模型来探索与最初不在病变“内”的病变中成功重新定位相关的因素。
R-EBUS图像改善组的诊断率显著高于R-EBUS图像未改善组(76.9%对46.4%,p = 0.001)。回归模型显示,术中R-EBUS检查结果的改善与高诊断率相关(优势比:3.55,95%置信区间,1.57 - 8.06,p = 0.002)。机器学习分析表明,病变内部位置和影像学可见性是成功重新定位的最有影响力的预测因素。所有组的并发症发生率相似(总并发症率:5.8%对4.3%对6.2%,p = 0.943)。
在TBNA/TBB或TBB联合EBUS-GS过程中,R-EBUS检查结果的改善与高诊断率相关,且并发症没有增加,即使最初的R-EBUS检查结果不充分。这表明术中反复探头重新定位可以安全地提高结果。