• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会和商业决定因素与神经健康的相关性。

The relevance of social and commercial determinants for neurological health.

机构信息

Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2022 Dec;21(12):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00428-8.

DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00428-8
PMID:36402161
Abstract

A disconnect has developed over the past two decades between neurological and neuroscientific research, which have seen notable innovation and development, and our increasing understanding of the role of social and commercial determinants of health, including the health of the nervous system. Over the next two decades, grounding neurological research in public health and epidemiological principles can bring about a paradigm shift, away from reductionism, over-medicalisation, and health inequities towards neurological research that reduces inequalities and has true relevance to the populations it aims to serve. People who are involved in neurological and neuroscientific research and practice, as clinicians, researchers, publishers, and funders, can create change by being more aware of the social and commercial determinants of health, reprioritising research funding, and advocating for greater neurological health equity.

摘要

在过去的二十年中,神经科学和神经科学研究之间出现了脱节,这两个领域都取得了显著的创新和发展,而我们对社会和商业决定健康因素的认识也在不断加深,包括神经系统的健康。在未来的二十年里,将神经科学研究扎根于公共卫生和流行病学原则可以带来范式转变,使我们摆脱还原论、过度医疗化和健康不平等,走向能够减少不平等并与目标人群真正相关的神经科学研究。参与神经科学和神经科学研究和实践的人,如临床医生、研究人员、出版者和资助者,可以通过更加关注健康的社会和商业决定因素、重新优先考虑研究资金以及倡导更大的神经健康公平来实现变革。

相似文献

1
The relevance of social and commercial determinants for neurological health.社会和商业决定因素与神经健康的相关性。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Dec;21(12):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00428-8.
2
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
3
Public Health's Next Step in Advancing Equity: Re-evaluating Epistemological Assumptions to Move Social Determinants From Theory to Practice.公共卫生在推进公平方面的下一步:重新评估认识论假设,将社会决定因素从理论推向实践。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 7;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.
4
Engaging Public Health Critical Race Praxis in Local Social Determinants of Health Research: The Youth Health Equity and Action Research Training Program in Portland, OR-yHEART.参与公共卫生关键种族实践在当地健康决定因素研究中:俄勒冈州波特兰的青年健康公平和行动研究培训计划-yHEART。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 4;19(13):8187. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138187.
5
[Innovating in public health: monitoring of social determinants of health and reduction of health inequities: a priority for Spanish presidency of the European union in 2010].[公共卫生领域的创新:健康社会决定因素监测与健康不平等现象的减少:2010年欧盟轮值主席国西班牙的一项优先任务]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2010 Jan-Feb;84(1):3-11. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272010000100002.
6
Training needs for research in health inequities among health and demographic researchers from eight African and Asian countries.来自八个非洲和亚洲国家的卫生和人口研究人员在健康不平等方面的研究培训需求。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 10;14:1254. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1254.
7
The impact and importance of place on health for young people of Pasifika descent in Queensland, Australia: a qualitative study towards developing meaningful health equity indicators.澳大利亚昆士兰州太平洋岛裔年轻人的居住环境对其健康的影响和重要性:制定有意义的健康公平指标的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0978-2.
8
Glossary of health equity concepts for public health action in the Canadian context.加拿大公共卫生行动健康公平概念词汇表。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Sep;73(9):802-805. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210851. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Thinking with and Against the Social Determinants of Health: The Latin American Social Medicine (Collective Health) Critique from Jaime Breilh.与健康社会决定因素对话和对抗:来自 Jaime Breilh 的拉丁美洲社会医学(集体健康)批判。
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Oct;52(4):433-441. doi: 10.1177/00207314221122657. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
Developing a screening tool to recognise social determinants of health in Australian clinical settings.开发一种筛查工具,以识别澳大利亚临床环境中的健康社会决定因素。
Public Health Res Pract. 2019 Dec 4;29(4):28341813. doi: 10.17061/phrp28341813.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing dementia care: a review of Italy's public health response within the WHO Global Action Plan and European strategies.推进痴呆症护理:意大利在世卫组织全球行动计划和欧洲战略框架内的公共卫生应对措施综述
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 17;3(2):e002250. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002250. eCollection 2025.
2
Social determinants of dementia: A scoping review.痴呆症的社会决定因素:一项范围综述。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70524. doi: 10.1002/alz.70524.
3
Estimating the impact of risk factor reduction on dementia prevalence in New Zealand.
评估降低风险因素对新西兰痴呆症患病率的影响。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70440. doi: 10.1002/alz.70440.
4
Scoping review of dementia primary prevention policies in England: do they balance reach and agency?英格兰痴呆症一级预防政策的范围审查:它们是否平衡了覆盖范围和能动性?
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jun 25;3(1):e002631. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-002631. eCollection 2025.
5
Aggression and Justice Involvement: Does Uric Acid Play a Role?攻击行为与司法介入:尿酸起作用吗?
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 2;15(3):268. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030268.
6
Imperatives and co-benefits of research into climate change and neurological disease.气候变化与神经疾病研究的当务之急和共同效益
Nat Rev Neurol. 2025 Apr;21(4):216-228. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-01055-6. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
7
Addressing the gaps between socioeconomic disparities and biological models of dementia.解决社会经济差异与痴呆症生物学模型之间的差距。
Brain. 2023 Sep 1;146(9):3561-3564. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad236.
8
The iceberg of dementia risk: empirical and conceptual arguments in favor of structural interventions for brain health.痴呆症风险的冰山:支持大脑健康结构性干预措施的实证和概念性论据。
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2023 Dec 16;6:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100193. eCollection 2024.
9
How many future dementia cases would be missed by a high-risk screening program? A retrospective cohort study in a population-based cohort.高风险筛查方案会错过多少未来的痴呆病例?一项基于人群的队列研究中的回顾性队列研究。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):6278-6286. doi: 10.1002/alz.14113. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
10
Brain health in diverse settings: How age, demographics and cognition shape brain function.多元环境下的大脑健康:年龄、人口统计学特征和认知如何塑造大脑功能。
Neuroimage. 2024 Jul 15;295:120636. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120636. Epub 2024 May 21.