Suppr超能文献

轻度产后高血压的严格与宽松控制:一项随机对照试验。

Tight vs liberal control of mild postpartum hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The MetroHealth System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (Drs Aderibigbe and Ranzini); Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Reproductive Biology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (Drs Aderibigbe and Hackney); Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Reproductive Biology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (Drs Aderibigbe and Lappen).

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Reproductive Biology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (Drs Aderibigbe and Hackney).

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Feb;5(2):100818. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100818. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-quality evidence to inform the management of postpartum hypertension, including the optimal blood pressure threshold to initiate therapy, is lacking. Randomized trials have been conducted in pregnancy, but there are no published trials to guide management in the postpartum period.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that initiating antihypertensive therapy in the postpartum period at a threshold of 140/90 mm Hg would result in less maternal morbidity than initiating therapy at a threshold of 150/95 mm Hg.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18 to 55 years with postpartum hypertension. Patients with chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia without severe features were randomized to 1 of 2 blood pressure thresholds to initiate treatment: persistent blood pressure of ≥150/95 mm Hg (institutional standard or "liberal control" group) or ≥140/90 mm Hg (intervention or "tight control" group). Our primary outcome was composite maternal morbidity defined as: severe hypertension (blood pressure ≥160/110 mm Hg) or preeclampsia with severe features, the need for a second antihypertensive agent, postpartum hospitalization >4 days, and maternal adverse outcome secondary to hypertension as evidenced by pulmonary edema, acute kidney injury (creatinine level ≥1.1 mg/dL), cardiac dysfunction (eg, elevated brain natriuretic peptide level) or cardiomyopathy, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, cerebrovascular accident, or admission to an intensive care unit. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission for hypertension, persistence of hypertension beyond 14 days, medication side effects, and time to blood pressure control. We calculated that 256 women would provide 90% power to detect a relative 50% reduction in the primary outcome from 36% in the standard blood pressure threshold group to 18%, with a 2-sided alpha set at 0.05 for significance. Data were analyzed using R statistical software.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients were randomized, including 128 to the "tight control" group (140/90 mm Hg) and 128 to the "liberal control" group (150/95 mm Hg). Patients in the "tight control" group had a higher body mass index at delivery (37.1±9.4 vs 34.9±8.1; P=.04); other demographic and obstetrical characteristics were similar between groups. The rate of the primary outcome was similar between groups (8.6% vs 11.7%; P=.41; relative risk, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.53). The rates of all secondary outcomes and the individual components of the primary and secondary outcome measures were also similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

In the postpartum period, initiation of antihypertensive therapy at a lower blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg did not decrease maternal morbidity or improve outcomes compared with a threshold of 150/95 mm Hg.

摘要

背景

缺乏高质量的证据来指导产后高血压的管理,包括启动治疗的最佳血压阈值。虽然已经在妊娠期间进行了随机试验,但目前还没有发表的试验来指导产后期间的管理。

目的

本研究旨在检验以下假设,即在产后期间将血压阈值设定为 140/90mmHg 启动降压治疗,与将阈值设定为 150/95mmHg(机构标准或“宽松控制”组)相比,会导致产妇发病率降低。

研究设计

我们对年龄在 18 至 55 岁之间的产后高血压患者进行了一项实用的多中心随机对照试验。将患有慢性高血压、妊娠期高血压和无严重特征的子痫前期的患者随机分为 2 个血压阈值组中的 1 个开始治疗:持续血压≥150/95mmHg(机构标准或“宽松控制”组)或≥140/90mmHg(干预或“严格控制”组)。我们的主要结局是复合产妇发病率,定义为:严重高血压(血压≥160/110mmHg)或伴有严重特征的子痫前期、需要第二种降压药物、产后住院时间超过 4 天、以及高血压导致的产妇不良后果,表现为肺水肿、急性肾损伤(肌酐水平≥1.1mg/dL)、心功能障碍(例如,升高的脑钠肽水平)或心肌病、可逆性后部脑病综合征、脑血管意外或入住重症监护病房。次要结局包括因高血压再次住院、14 天后仍持续高血压、药物副作用以及血压控制时间。我们计算出,256 名患者将提供 90%的效能,以检测主要结局的相对减少 50%,从标准血压阈值组的 36%降至 18%,双侧α值设定为 0.05 以表示显著差异。数据使用 R 统计软件进行分析。

结果

共随机分配了 256 名患者,其中 128 名患者进入“严格控制”组(140/90mmHg),128 名患者进入“宽松控制”组(150/95mmHg)。“严格控制”组患者的分娩时体重指数更高(37.1±9.4 与 34.9±8.1;P=.04);其他人口统计学和产科特征在两组间相似。两组主要结局的发生率相似(8.6%与 11.7%;P=.41;相对风险,0.73;95%置信区间,0.35-1.53)。次要结局的发生率以及主要和次要结局测量的各个组成部分也在两组间相似。

结论

在产后期间,将降压治疗的起始血压阈值设定为 140/90mmHg 并不会降低产妇发病率或改善结局,与设定为 150/95mmHg 相比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验