Suppr超能文献

[德国姑息治疗中的物理治疗和职业治疗:我们目前的状况如何?]

[Physical therapy and occupational therapy in German palliative care: Where do we stand?].

作者信息

Pape Anna Elisabeth, Gschnell Martin, Maul Julian, Volberg Christian

机构信息

Klinik für Geriatrie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum Bremen-Ost, Bremen, Deutschland.

Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Hauttumorzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Dec;175:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) as supportive forms of treatment in palliative care, together with other treatment measures, can create participation for seriously ill patients in the form of a life that is as autonomous as possible until the end of life. However, specially trained staff are needed for the care of palliative patients in order to do justice to the clients' special life situation. In Germany, no corresponding survey on the subject has so far been conducted. So it is unclear to what extent PT and OT are offered in palliative care structures in this country, which tasks are assigned to the respective professional groups, and what the level of knowledge is that caregivers have about treatment options.

AIM

Compilation of an overview of the provision, need and use of PT and OT in the various areas of palliative care in Germany. If there is a lack of provision, the reasons for this will be identified.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey, a self-designed 9-item questionnaire was sent out to a total of 260 hospices, 323 palliative care units and 304 specialized outpatient palliative care services (SOPC) listed on the homepage of the German Society for Palliative Medicine (DGP). The respondents' answers were analysed using a purely descriptive approach.

RESULTS

The response rate was 439 (49.5%). A total of 434 questionnaires (49%) were included in the analysis. A heterogeneous distribution of PT and OT offers between outpatient, inpatient, and hospice palliative care can be seen, with the outpatient area showing a significantly fewer offerings. 29% of the SOPC teams can offer neither PT nor OT. This is mostly due to a shortage of skilled workers or a lack of funding opportunities. The different areas of responsibility of physiotherapists and occupational therapists are known to the majority of respondents (hospice 87%, palliative care unit 83%, SOPC 81%) and are also reflected in the distribution of tasks between the two professional groups. Especially palliative care units and SOPC teams state that they would like to offer more PT and OT (palliative care units 42% more PT and 58% more OT; SOPC 65% more PT and 50% more OT).

DISCUSSION

This cross-sectional survey is the first of its kind to provide an overview of the PT and OT offerings in the different sectors of German palliative care. In a comparison of the two forms of therapy, occupational therapists are used less frequently than physiotherapists. An international comparison of the study situation also shows that the use of OT in palliative care, in particular, has not yet been implemented satisfactorily. Outside Germany, the main reasons for this are a shortage of specialists and a lack of knowledge about the tasks of OT.

CONCLUSION

PT and OT are frequently used treatment options in all areas of German palliative care. In order to better classify structural problems in care, further differentiated surveys should be conducted. Furthermore, a better knowledge base should be created through research and information activities of both professional groups in palliative care.

摘要

引言

物理治疗(PT)和职业治疗(OT)作为姑息治疗中的支持性治疗形式,与其他治疗措施一起,可以使重症患者尽可能自主地参与生活,直至生命终结。然而,为了公正地对待患者的特殊生活状况,需要经过专门培训的工作人员来照顾姑息治疗患者。在德国,迄今为止尚未针对该主题进行相应的调查。因此,目前尚不清楚在该国的姑息治疗机构中,物理治疗和职业治疗的提供程度如何,各自专业团队被分配了哪些任务,以及护理人员对治疗选择的了解程度如何。

目的

汇编德国姑息治疗各个领域中物理治疗和职业治疗的提供情况、需求及使用情况概述。如果存在提供不足的情况,将找出其原因。

方法

在这项横断面调查中,向德国姑息医学协会(DGP)主页上列出的总共260家临终关怀医院、323个姑息治疗单元和304个专门的门诊姑息治疗服务机构(SOPC)发送了一份自行设计的包含9个项目的问卷。使用纯描述性方法分析受访者的答案。

结果

回复率为439份(49.5%)。总共434份问卷(49%)纳入分析。可以看出,门诊、住院和临终关怀姑息治疗中物理治疗和职业治疗服务的分布不均,门诊区域的服务明显较少。29%的门诊姑息治疗服务团队既无法提供物理治疗也无法提供职业治疗。这主要是由于缺乏技术工人或资金机会不足。大多数受访者(临终关怀医院87%、姑息治疗单元83%、门诊姑息治疗服务机构81%)了解物理治疗师和职业治疗师的不同职责领域,这也反映在两个专业团队之间的任务分配上。特别是姑息治疗单元和门诊姑息治疗服务团队表示,他们希望提供更多的物理治疗和职业治疗(姑息治疗单元物理治疗增加42%,职业治疗增加58%;门诊姑息治疗服务机构物理治疗增加65%,职业治疗增加50%)。

讨论

这项横断面调查是同类调查中的首次,提供了德国姑息治疗不同部门中物理治疗和职业治疗服务的概述。在两种治疗形式的比较中,职业治疗师的使用频率低于物理治疗师。对研究情况的国际比较还表明,尤其是在姑息治疗中职业治疗的应用尚未得到令人满意的实施。在德国境外,主要原因是专家短缺以及对职业治疗任务缺乏了解。

结论

物理治疗和职业治疗是德国姑息治疗所有领域中常用的治疗选择。为了更好地分类护理中的结构问题,应进行进一步的差异化调查。此外,通过姑息治疗两个专业团队的研究和信息活动,应建立更好的知识基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验