• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究方案:评估德国黑森州的专门门诊姑息治疗(ELSAH 研究) - 工作包 I:评估护理质量。

Study protocol: evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH study) - work package I: assessing the quality of care.

机构信息

Department of General Practice/ Family Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse 4, 35032, Marburg, Germany.

Professional Association of Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care in Hesse, Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Oct 2;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0363-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-018-0363-8
PMID:30285709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6169025/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Germany, patients suffering from life-limiting conditions are eligible for specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC). Evaluation of the quality of this service lacks currently integration of patient-relevant outcomes. There is also no scientific consensus how to prove quality of care in the special context of SOPC adequately. Existing quality reports are primarily based on descriptive structural data which do not allow for estimation of process quality or result quality. The ELSAH study ('Evaluation of Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care in the German state of Hesse') aims to choose - or, if necessary, to adopt - to evaluate and to implement a suit of measures to assess, evaluate and monitor the quality of specialized, home-based palliative care.

METHODS

All 22 SOPC teams providing their services in the state of Hesse, Germany, participate in the ELSAH study. The study is divided in two phases: a preparation phase and a main study phase. Based on the findings of the preparation phase we have chosen a preliminary set of instruments including the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, Views on Care, Zarit Burden Interview, Phase of Illness, Goal Attainment Scaling, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, Consumer Quality Indices Palliative Care and Sense of Security in Care. During the main study phase, we will use a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the instruments' psychometric properties (reliability, validity, feasibility and practicability), to identify barriers, facilitators and limitations of their routine use and to explore how their use affects the care within the SOPC setting.

DISCUSSION

At the end of this study, an outcome- and patient-centered, validated measurement approach should be provided, adapted for standardized evaluations in SOPC across patient groups, palliative care services and regions nationwide. The standardized application of instruments should allow for making valid statements and comparisons of health care quality in SOPC based on process- and outcome-evaluation rather than relying on structural data only. Moreover, the instruments might directly influence the care of patients in palliative situations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00012421 ).

摘要

背景

在德国,患有生命末期疾病的患者有资格接受专门的门诊姑息治疗(SOPC)。目前,对这种服务质量的评估缺乏患者相关结果的综合评估。在 SOPC 的特殊情况下,也没有科学共识如何充分证明护理质量。现有的质量报告主要基于描述性结构数据,这些数据无法估计过程质量或结果质量。ELSAH 研究(“评估德国黑森州的专门门诊姑息治疗”)旨在选择-或者,如果有必要,采用-评估和实施一整套措施,以评估、评估和监测专门的、家庭为基础的姑息治疗的质量。

方法

德国黑森州所有提供 SOPC 服务的 22 个 SOPC 团队都参与了 ELSAH 研究。该研究分为两个阶段:准备阶段和主要研究阶段。基于准备阶段的发现,我们选择了一组初步的工具,包括综合姑息治疗结果量表、护理观、Zarit 负担访谈、疾病阶段、目标实现量表、东部合作肿瘤组表现状态、消费者质量指数姑息护理和护理安全感。在主要研究阶段,我们将采用混合方法评估工具的心理测量学特性(可靠性、有效性、可行性和实用性),确定其常规使用的障碍、促进因素和限制因素,并探讨其使用如何影响 SOPC 环境中的护理。

讨论

在这项研究结束时,应提供一种以结果和患者为中心、经过验证的测量方法,以适应全国 SOPC 中针对不同患者群体、姑息治疗服务和地区的标准化评估。标准化应用工具应能够根据过程和结果评估而不是仅依赖结构数据,对 SOPC 中的医疗保健质量做出有效陈述和比较。此外,这些工具可能会直接影响处于姑息治疗状态的患者的护理。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册处(DRKS-ID:DRKS00012421)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2003/6169025/d506a012992d/12904_2018_363_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2003/6169025/d506a012992d/12904_2018_363_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2003/6169025/d506a012992d/12904_2018_363_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Study protocol: evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH study) - work package I: assessing the quality of care.研究方案:评估德国黑森州的专门门诊姑息治疗(ELSAH 研究) - 工作包 I:评估护理质量。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Oct 2;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0363-8.
2
Study protocol: evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH study) - work package II: palliative care for pediatric patients.研究方案:德国黑森州专门门诊姑息治疗(SOPC)的评估(ELSAH 研究)-工作包 II:儿科患者的姑息治疗。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jan 5;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0268-y.
3
State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use.全州范围内在专科门诊姑息治疗团队中实施患者报告结局测量(PROMs)(ELSAH):一项混合方法评估及其对可持续使用的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 2;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w.
4
Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness.将患者和照料者报告的结局测量指标整合到专科门诊姑息治疗的日常护理常规中:一项关于可行性、可接受性和适宜性的定性研究(ELSAH)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 2;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1.
5
[Specialized outpatient palliative care for children, adolescents, and their families-the special needs of the target group. Results of the ELSAH study].[针对儿童、青少年及其家庭的专科门诊姑息治疗——目标群体的特殊需求。ELSAH研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Mar;65(3):357-366. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03500-7. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Study protocol for a multi-methods study: SAVOIR - evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) in Germany: outcomes, interactions, regional differences.多方法研究方案:SAVOIR - 德国专科门诊姑息治疗(SAPV)的评估:结局、相互作用、区域差异。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 26;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0398-5.
7
Effectiveness of a specialized outpatient palliative care service as experienced by patients and caregivers.患者和照护者所体验的专科门诊姑息治疗服务的效果。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Aug;16(8):848-56. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0491. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Neurological consultations via telemedicine for specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) at home and in hospice (TANNE project): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.通过远程医疗进行神经内科咨询,为家庭和临终关怀中的专科门诊姑息治疗(SOPC)提供服务(TANNE 项目):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 6;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01088-y.
9
How can we ensure the success of specialised palliative home-care? A qualitative study (ELSAH) identifying key issues from the perspective of patients, relatives and health professionals.我们如何确保专科姑息家庭护理的成功?一项定性研究(ELSAH)从患者、亲属和卫生专业人员的角度确定关键问题。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1844-1855. doi: 10.1177/02692163211026516. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
Analysing the administration of an intermediate level of outpatient palliative care in Germany and developing recommendations for improvement (Polite): A study protocol for a mixed-methods study.分析德国中级门诊姑息治疗管理并为改进提供建议(Polite):一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256467. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use.全州范围内在专科门诊姑息治疗团队中实施患者报告结局测量(PROMs)(ELSAH):一项混合方法评估及其对可持续使用的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 2;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w.
2
Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness.将患者和照料者报告的结局测量指标整合到专科门诊姑息治疗的日常护理常规中:一项关于可行性、可接受性和适宜性的定性研究(ELSAH)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 2;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
[Palliative Home Care Teams in Germany].[德国的姑息居家护理团队]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018 Apr;143(8):558-565. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115628. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis.居家舒缓疗护:研究质量、主要结局和主题构成分析的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 7;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z.
3
Study protocol: evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH study) - work package II: palliative care for pediatric patients.
[Specialized outpatient palliative care for children, adolescents, and their families-the special needs of the target group. Results of the ELSAH study].[针对儿童、青少年及其家庭的专科门诊姑息治疗——目标群体的特殊需求。ELSAH研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Mar;65(3):357-366. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03500-7. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
研究方案:德国黑森州专门门诊姑息治疗(SOPC)的评估(ELSAH 研究)-工作包 II:儿科患者的姑息治疗。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jan 5;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0268-y.
4
Phase of Illness in palliative care: Cross-sectional analysis of clinical data from community, hospital and hospice patients.姑息治疗中的疾病阶段:来自社区、医院和临终关怀患者的临床数据的横断面分析。
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):404-412. doi: 10.1177/0269216317727157. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
What do we know about different models of providing palliative care? Findings from a systematic review of reviews.我们对提供姑息治疗的不同模式了解多少?系统评价综述的结果。
Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;31(9):781-797. doi: 10.1177/0269216317701890. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Home palliative care works: but how? A meta-ethnography of the experiences of patients and family caregivers.居家姑息治疗有效:但如何起效?一项关于患者及家庭照护者经历的元民族志研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Dec;7(4):0. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001141. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
7
EAPC White Paper on outcome measurement in palliative care: Improving practice, attaining outcomes and delivering quality services - Recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Task Force on Outcome Measurement.欧洲姑息治疗学会(EAPC)关于姑息治疗结局测量的白皮书:改进实践、实现结局并提供优质服务——EAPC结局测量特别工作组的建议
Palliat Med. 2016 Jan;30(1):6-22. doi: 10.1177/0269216315589898. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
[Cognitive interviewing - a tool to develop and validate questionnaires].认知访谈——一种开发和验证问卷的工具
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Feb;54(1):53-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394443. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
The sense of security in care--Relatives' Evaluation instrument: its development and presentation.护理中的安全感——亲属评估工具:其开发与展示
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar;49(3):586-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
10
The instrument 'sense of security in care--patients' evaluation': its development and presentation.“护理安全感——患者评估”工具:其开发与展示
Psychooncology. 2014 Aug;23(8):914-20. doi: 10.1002/pon.3502. Epub 2014 Feb 14.