Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131, Padova, Italy.
School of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 19;12(1):19952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23720-w.
Peripheral object discrimination is hindered by a central dynamic mask presented between 150 and 300 ms after stimulus onset. The mask is thought to interfere with task-relevant feedback coming from higher visual areas to the foveal cortex in V1. Fan et al. (2016) supported this hypothesis by showing that the effect of mask can be further delayed if the task requires mental manipulation of the peripheral target. The main purpose of this study was to better characterize the temporal dynamics of foveal feedback. Specifically, in two experiments we have shown that (1) the effect of foveal noise mask is sufficiently robust to be replicated in an online data collection (2) in addition to a change in sensitivity the mask affects also the criterion, which becomes more conservative; (3) the expected dipper function for sensitivity approximates a quartic with a global minimum at 94 ms, while the best fit for criterion is a quintic with a global maximum at 174 ms; (4) the power spectrum analysis of perceptual oscillations in sensitivity data shows a cyclic effect of mask at 3 and 12 Hz. Overall, our results show that foveal noise affects sensitivity in a cyclic manner, with a global dip emerging earlier than previously found. The noise also affects the response bias, even though with a different temporal profile. We, therefore, suggest that foveal noise acts on two distinct feedback mechanisms, a faster perceptual feedback followed by a slower cognitive feedback.
外周物体辨别受到刺激后 150 至 300 毫秒之间出现的中央动态掩蔽的阻碍。掩蔽被认为会干扰来自较高视觉区域到 V1 中央凹皮层的与任务相关的反馈。范等人(2016)通过表明,如果任务需要对外周目标进行心理操作,则掩蔽的效果可以进一步延迟,从而支持了这一假设。本研究的主要目的是更好地表征中央凹反馈的时间动态。具体来说,在两项实验中,我们表明:(1)中央凹噪声掩蔽的效果足够稳健,可以在在线数据收集(2)中复制,除了灵敏度的变化外,掩蔽还会影响标准,标准变得更加保守;(3)灵敏度的预期迪珀函数近似为四次函数,全局最小值为 94 毫秒,而标准的最佳拟合为五次函数,全局最大值为 174 毫秒;(4)灵敏度数据中感知振荡的功率谱分析显示掩蔽在 3 和 12 Hz 处具有周期性效应。总体而言,我们的结果表明,中央凹噪声以循环方式影响灵敏度,全局凹陷比以前发现的更早出现。噪声也会影响响应偏差,尽管时间分布不同。因此,我们建议中央凹噪声作用于两个不同的反馈机制,一个是更快的感知反馈,随后是较慢的认知反馈。