Primary Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton Street, Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05165-1.
Many family medicine residency graduates indicate a desire to provide obstetric care, but a low proportion of family physicians (FPs) provide obstetric care within their practice. This suggests personal preference alone may not account for the low proportion of FPs who ultimately provide full obstetric care. If decisionmakers plan to augment the number of FPs providing obstetric care, barriers to the provision of such care must first be identified. Within this paper, we explore the perspectives of both family practice residents and early-career FPs on the factors that shaped their decision to provide obstetric care.
In this qualitative study, we analyzed a subset of interview data from three Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia (n = 18 family practice residents; n = 39 early-career FPs). We used thematic analysis to analyze data relevant to obstetric care practice, applying the socio-ecological model and comparing themes across participant types, gender, and province.
Participants described influences affecting their decision about providing obstetric care. Key influencing factors aligned with the levels of the socio-ecological model of public policy (i.e., liability), community (i.e., community needs), organizational (e.g., obstetric care trade-offs, working in teams, sufficient exposure in training), interpersonal practice preferences (i.e., impact on family life, negative interactions with other healthcare professionals), and individual factors (i.e., defining comprehensive care as "everything but obstetrics"). Many participants were interested in providing obstetric care within their practice but did not provide such care. Participants' decision-making around providing or not providing obstetric care included considerations of personal preferences and outside influences.
Individual-level factors alone do not account for the decrease in the type and amount of obstetric care offered by FPs. Instead, FPs' choice to provide or not provide obstetric care is influenced by factors at higher levels of the socio-ecological model. Policymakers who want to encourage obstetric practice by FPs should implement interventions at the public policy, community, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels.
许多家庭医学住院医师表示希望提供产科护理,但只有少数家庭医生(FP)在其实践中提供产科护理。这表明仅凭个人偏好可能无法解释为什么最终只有少数 FP 提供全面的产科护理。如果决策者计划增加提供产科护理的 FP 数量,那么首先必须确定提供此类护理的障碍。在本文中,我们探讨了家庭实习医生和早期职业 FP 对塑造他们提供产科护理决策的因素的看法。
在这项定性研究中,我们分析了来自加拿大三个省份(不列颠哥伦比亚省、安大略省和新斯科舍省)的访谈数据的一个子集(n=18 名家庭实习医生;n=39 名早期职业 FP)。我们使用主题分析来分析与产科护理实践相关的数据,应用社会生态模式并比较参与者类型、性别和省份的主题。
参与者描述了影响他们提供产科护理决策的因素。关键影响因素与公共政策的社会生态模式(即责任)、社区(即社区需求)、组织(如产科护理权衡、团队合作、培训中充分接触)、人际实践偏好(即对家庭生活的影响、与其他医疗保健专业人员的负面互动)和个人因素(即定义全面护理为“除了产科护理之外的一切”)相一致。许多参与者有兴趣在实践中提供产科护理,但没有提供此类护理。参与者在提供或不提供产科护理方面的决策考虑了个人偏好和外部影响。
个人层面的因素本身并不能解释 FP 提供的产科护理类型和数量的减少。相反,FP 提供或不提供产科护理的选择受到社会生态模式中更高层次因素的影响。希望通过 FP 鼓励产科实践的政策制定者应该在公共政策、社区、组织、人际和个人层面实施干预措施。