Department of Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518038, China.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518038, China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02234-1.
Currently, the microbial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in children remains challenging. While Gram stain and sputum culture are commonly used to detect bacterial pathogens, it is unclear whether these approaches can predict single pathogen from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) culture.
A retrospective study involving 287 children hospitalized for pneumonia was conducted. Sputum specimens were collected on admission; and BALF specimens were collected within 24 h after admission. Taking BALF culture as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of Sputum Gram stain (SGS), sputum culture, and BALF Gram stain (BGS) were calculated. The agreement between these approaches and BALF culture was compared using kappa statistics.
For SGS, the specificity was 23%. The overall sensitivity was 70%, including 87% for Gram-positive (G+) cocci, 56% for Gram-negative (G-) cocci, and 50% for G-bacilli. For sputum culture, the specificity was 70%. The overall sensitivity was 64%, including 71% for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 71% for Moraxella catarrhalis, and 64% for Haemophilus influenzae. For BGS, the specificity was 71%. The overall sensitivity was 60%, including 77% for G+cocci, 38% for G-cocci, and 44% for G-bacilli. While SGS had poor agreement with BALF culture, both sputum culture and BGS had moderate agreement with BALF culture.
Both sputum culture and BGS are helpful in predicting single bacterial pathogen from BALF culture among children with community-acquired pneumonia. Sputum cultures and BGS can provide early clues for BALF pathogen when BALF culture results are pending or bronchoscopy is not performed.
目前,儿童社区获得性肺炎的微生物病因仍然具有挑战性。虽然革兰氏染色和痰培养常用于检测细菌病原体,但尚不清楚这些方法是否可以预测支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)培养物中的单一病原体。
对 287 名因肺炎住院的儿童进行了回顾性研究。入院时采集痰标本;入院后 24 小时内采集 BALF 标本。以 BALF 培养为参考标准,计算痰革兰氏染色(SGS)、痰培养和 BALF 革兰氏染色(BGS)的敏感性和特异性。使用 Kappa 统计比较这些方法与 BALF 培养的一致性。
对于 SGS,特异性为 23%。总体敏感性为 70%,其中革兰氏阳性(G+)球菌为 87%,革兰氏阴性(G-)球菌为 56%,革兰氏杆菌为 50%。对于痰培养,特异性为 70%。总体敏感性为 64%,其中肺炎链球菌为 71%,卡他莫拉菌为 71%,流感嗜血杆菌为 64%。对于 BGS,特异性为 71%。总体敏感性为 60%,其中 G+球菌为 77%,G-球菌为 38%,革兰氏杆菌为 44%。虽然 SGS 与 BALF 培养的一致性较差,但痰培养和 BGS 与 BALF 培养的一致性均为中度。
痰培养和 BGS 均有助于预测儿童社区获得性肺炎中 BALF 培养物中的单一细菌病原体。当 BALF 培养结果未知或未进行支气管镜检查时,痰培养和 BGS 可提供 BALF 病原体的早期线索。