Suppr超能文献

基于节奏的41至85岁成年人中等强度地面行走分类

Cadence-based classification of moderate-intensity overground walking in 41- to 85-year-old adults.

作者信息

Aguiar Elroy J, Mora-Gonzalez Jose, Ducharme Scott W, Moore Christopher C, Gould Zachary R, Chase Colleen J, Amalbert-Birriel Marcos A, Chipkin Stuart R, Staudenmayer John, Zheng Peixuan, Tudor-Locke Catrine

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.

College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023 Apr;33(4):433-443. doi: 10.1111/sms.14274. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Walking cadence (steps/min) has emerged as a valid proxy of physical activity intensity, with consensus across numerous laboratory-based treadmill studies that ≥100 steps/min approximates absolutely defined moderate intensity (≥3 metabolic equivalents; METs). We recently reported that this cadence threshold had a classification accuracy of 73.3% for identifying moderate intensity during preferred pace overground walking in young adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of a cadence threshold of ≥100 steps/min for correctly classifying moderate intensity during overground walking in middle- and older-aged adults.

METHODS

Participants (N = 174, 48.3% female, 41-85 years of age) completed laboratory-based cross-sectional study involving an indoor 5-min overground walking trial at their preferred pace. Steps were manually counted and converted to cadence (total steps/5 min). Intensity was measured using indirect calorimetry and expressed as METs. Classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) of a cadence threshold of ≥100 steps/min to identify individuals walking at ≥3 METs was calculated.

RESULTS

The ≥100 steps/min threshold demonstrated accuracy of 74.7% for classifying moderate intensity. When comparing middle- vs. older-aged adults, similar accuracy (73.4% vs. 75.8%, respectively) and specificity (33.3% vs. 34.5%) were observed. Sensitivity was high, but was lower for middle- vs. older-aged adults (85.2% vs. 93.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A cadence threshold of ≥100 steps/min accurately identified moderate-intensity overground walking. Furthermore, accuracy was similar when comparing middle- and older-aged adults. These findings extend our previous analysis in younger adults and confirm the appropriateness of applying this cadence threshold across the adult lifespan.

摘要

背景

步行节奏(步/分钟)已成为身体活动强度的有效指标,众多基于实验室跑步机研究达成的共识是,≥100步/分钟接近绝对定义的中等强度(≥3代谢当量;METs)。我们最近报告称,在年轻人以偏好步速进行地面行走时,该节奏阈值识别中等强度的分类准确率为73.3%。本研究的目的是评估和比较≥100步/分钟的节奏阈值在正确分类中老年人地面行走中等强度时的表现。

方法

参与者(N = 174,48.3%为女性,年龄41 - 85岁)完成了一项基于实验室的横断面研究,包括以其偏好步速进行5分钟的室内地面行走试验。手动计数步数并转换为节奏(总步数/5分钟)。使用间接量热法测量强度并以METs表示。计算≥100步/分钟的节奏阈值识别以≥3 METs行走个体的分类准确率(敏感性、特异性、准确率)。

结果

≥100步/分钟的阈值在分类中等强度时的准确率为74.7%。在比较中年人与老年人时,观察到类似的准确率(分别为73.4%和75.8%)和特异性(分别为33.3%和34.5%)。敏感性较高,但中年人低于老年人(分别为85.2%和93.9%)。

结论

≥100步/分钟的节奏阈值准确识别了中等强度的地面行走。此外,在比较中年人和老年人时准确率相似。这些发现扩展了我们之前对年轻人的分析,并证实了在整个成年期应用该节奏阈值的适用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验