Byun Joo-Young, Lee Ju-Eun, Shim Yoon-Bo, Kim Jihyun, Lee Sun Young, Shin Bo Ra, Yoon Na Ri, Park Mi-Hai, Lee Eui-Kyung
School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066, Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
AstraZeneca Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Adv Ther. 2023 Feb;40(2):550-567. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02358-0. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
Although many patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience recurrence despite complete resection, few studies have reported on the corresponding economic burden. This study aimed to understand the economic impact of recurrence by measuring healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with recurrent stage IB-IIIA NSCLC.
Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment claims data from South Korea, we included patients who underwent complete resection for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC during the index period (January 1, 2012, to October 31, 2018). Patients who experienced recurrence were matched with those who did not using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching. The mean healthcare costs and resource utilization were analyzed from the date of complete resection to the last claims for cancer treatment. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to estimate the impact of covariates on healthcare costs. A difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was conducted to analyze the healthcare costs between the two groups before and after recurrence.
Patients with recurrence incurred higher healthcare costs, particularly in outpatient settings. The cost of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors primarily contributed to cost differences, and medication costs increased over time after complete resection. Patients with recurrence were also hospitalized more frequently (9.3 vs. 5.0, p < 0.0001) for a longer period (74 days vs. 42 days, p < 0.0001) than those without recurrence. GLM analysis showed that the total cost was 2.31-fold higher in patients with recurrence (95% confidence interval: 2.19-2.44). The DID analysis showed significantly increased total costs in patients with recurrence (β = 26,269, p < 0.0001), which was mostly attributed to medication costs (β = 17,951, p < 0.0001).
Recurrence of completely resected NSCLC leads to a substantial increase in healthcare costs and resource utilization. The results of this study show the economic burden of recurrence, which may help future economic analyses and resource allocation.
尽管许多早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在完全切除术后仍会复发,但很少有研究报道相应的经济负担。本研究旨在通过测量复发性IB-IIIA期NSCLC患者的医疗费用和资源利用情况,了解复发的经济影响。
利用韩国健康保险审查与评估索赔数据,我们纳入了在索引期(2012年1月1日至2018年10月31日)接受IB-IIIA期NSCLC完全切除的患者。经历复发的患者与未复发的患者采用1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配。从完全切除日期到癌症治疗的最后一次索赔,分析平均医疗费用和资源利用情况。使用广义线性模型(GLM)估计协变量对医疗费用的影响。进行差异分析(DID)以分析两组在复发前后的医疗费用。
复发患者产生了更高的医疗费用,尤其是在门诊环境中。靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂的费用是造成费用差异的主要原因,并且在完全切除术后药物费用随时间增加。与未复发患者相比,复发患者住院频率更高(9.3次对5.0次,p<0.0001),住院时间更长(74天对42天,p<0.0001)。GLM分析显示,复发患者的总费用高出2.31倍(95%置信区间:2.19-2.44)。DID分析显示,复发患者的总费用显著增加(β=26,269,p<0.0001),这主要归因于药物费用(β=17,951,p<0.0001)。
完全切除的NSCLC复发导致医疗费用和资源利用大幅增加。本研究结果显示了复发的经济负担,这可能有助于未来的经济分析和资源分配。