Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):1066-1072. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006593.
Diagnostic uncertainty is challenging to identify and study in clinical practice. This study compares differences in diagnosis code and health care utilization between a unique cohort of hospitalized children with uncertain diagnoses (UD) and matched controls.
This case-control study was conducted at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Cases were defined as patients admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service and having UDs during their hospitalization. Control patients were matched on age strata, biological sex, and time of year. Outcomes included type of diagnosis codes used (ie, disease- or nondisease-based) and change in code from admission to discharge. Differences in diagnosis codes were evaluated using conditional logistic regression. Health care utilization outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), hospital transfer, consulting service utilization, rapid response team activations, escalation to intensive care, and 30-day health care reutilization. Differences in health care utilization were assessed using bivariate statistics.
Our final cohort included 240 UD cases and 911 matched controls. Compared with matched controls, UD cases were 8 times more likely to receive a nondisease-based diagnosis code (odds ratio [OR], 8.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-11.2) and 2.5 times more likely to have a change in their primary International Classification of Disease, 10th revision, diagnosis code between admission and discharge (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.9-3.4). UD cases had a longer average LOS and higher transfer rates to our main hospital campus, consulting service use, and 30-day readmission rates.
Hospitalized children with UDs have meaningfully different patterns of diagnosis code use and increased health care utilization compared with matched controls.
在临床实践中,诊断不确定性难以识别和研究。本研究比较了一组具有不确定诊断(UD)的住院儿童与匹配对照之间诊断代码和医疗保健利用的差异。
本病例对照研究在辛辛那提儿童医疗中心进行。病例定义为入住儿科医院医学服务并在住院期间存在 UD 的患者。对照患者按年龄层、生物性别和年时间进行匹配。结果包括使用的诊断代码类型(即基于疾病或非疾病的)以及从入院到出院的代码变化。使用条件逻辑回归评估诊断代码差异。医疗保健利用结果包括住院时间(LOS)、医院转院、咨询服务利用、快速反应团队激活、重症监护升级和 30 天医疗保健再利用。使用双变量统计评估医疗保健利用差异。
我们的最终队列包括 240 例 UD 病例和 911 例匹配对照。与匹配对照相比,UD 病例更有可能接受非疾病诊断代码(比值比 [OR],8.0;95%置信区间 [CI],5.7-11.2),并且其主要国际疾病分类第 10 版诊断代码在入院和出院之间发生变化的可能性高出 2.5 倍(OR,2.5;95%CI,1.9-3.4)。UD 病例的平均 LOS 更长,转至我院主院区的比例更高,咨询服务的使用和 30 天再入院率更高。
与匹配对照相比,患有 UD 的住院儿童在诊断代码使用和医疗保健利用方面存在明显不同的模式。