Suppr超能文献

一项针对澳大利亚一家三级医疗中心非输卵管异位妊娠管理结局的10年回顾性队列研究。

A 10-year retrospective cohort study of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy management outcomes in an Australian tertiary centre.

作者信息

Loh Wei-Guo Nicholas, Adno Alan Maurice, Reid Shannon

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Liverpool Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia.

South Western Sydney Clinical School University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Aug 3;25(4):166-175. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12312. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy (NTEP) is a rare but significant early pregnancy complication which can result in maternal morbidity and mortality. There is however a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the management of NTEP.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the success rates of expectant, medical and surgical management in the treatment of NTEP at our tertiary centre.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2020. All NTEP were classified by ectopic sites. Primary management was classified by expectant, medical [systemic methotrexate (Sys-MTX) and/or local ultrasound-guided injection of MTX and/or KCl intra-sac (L-MTX, L-MTX/KCl)] or surgical. Primary management was considered successful if no change in intervention was required. Treatment complications were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-four NTEP were identified, which included 14 interstitial pregnancies (IP), 9 caesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) and 1 ovarian pregnancy (OP), which gave NTEP an incidence of 7.12% among all EP (4.15% for IP, 2.67% for CSP and 0.30% for OP). The success of primary surgical management was 100% (7/7), primary medical management was 76.9% (10/13) and primary expectant management was 33.3% (1/3). Primary medical management had a non-statistically significant greater mean time to serum ß-human Chorionic Gonadotrophin <5 IU/L, mean length of hospitalisation, mean number of follow-up visits and hospital re-presentation/readmissions compared to primary surgical management. There was no other difference in complication rates between the treatment management groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgery remains the most effective way to manage NTEP. However, medical management can be a safe and effective alternative option in carefully selected cases.

摘要

引言

非输卵管异位妊娠(NTEP)是一种罕见但严重的早期妊娠并发症,可导致孕产妇发病和死亡。然而,目前缺乏关于NTEP管理的循证指南。

目的

评估在我们的三级中心,期待治疗、药物治疗和手术治疗NTEP的成功率。

方法

对2010年至2020年进行回顾性队列研究。所有NTEP均按异位部位分类。初始治疗分为期待治疗、药物治疗[全身用甲氨蝶呤(Sys-MTX)和/或局部超声引导下向孕囊内注射甲氨蝶呤和/或氯化钾(L-MTX、L-MTX/KCl)]或手术治疗。如果无需改变干预措施,则初始治疗被视为成功。比较治疗并发症。

结果

共识别出24例NTEP,其中包括14例间质部妊娠(IP)、9例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)和1例卵巢妊娠(OP),NTEP在所有异位妊娠中的发生率为7.12%(IP为4.15%,CSP为2.67%,OP为0.30%)。初始手术治疗的成功率为100%(7/7),初始药物治疗为76.9%(10/13),初始期待治疗为33.3%(1/3)。与初始手术治疗相比,初始药物治疗至血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素<5 IU/L的平均时间、平均住院时间、平均随访次数及再次入院/住院的差异无统计学意义。治疗组之间的并发症发生率无其他差异。

结论

手术仍然是治疗NTEP最有效的方法。然而,在精心挑选的病例中,药物治疗可以是一种安全有效的替代选择。

相似文献

1
A 10-year retrospective cohort study of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy management outcomes in an Australian tertiary centre.
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Aug 3;25(4):166-175. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12312. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Effectiveness of conservative medical treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a multicenter study.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 20:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101762.
3
Direct Methotrexate Injection into the Gestational Sac for Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Review of Efficacy and Outcomes from a Single Institution.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
5
Management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in France: Results of a practice survey.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Apr;51(4):102330. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102330. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
8
Management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies at a large tertiary hospital.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Jul;33(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Methotrexate vs placebo in early tubal ectopic pregnancy: a multi- centre double-blind randomised trial.
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2012 Aug;7(3):238-43. doi: 10.2174/157488712802281321.
10
Conservative management of interstitial pregnancies: experience of a single centre.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):848-853. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1417979. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Evolution in training in ultrasound.
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Nov 9;25(4):159. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12326. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Cesarean scar pregnancy IS an ectopic pregnancy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):831-832. doi: 10.1002/uog.24921.
2
A Cesarean scar pregnancy is not an ectopic pregnancy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;59(4):424-427. doi: 10.1002/uog.24877. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice.
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Dec 16;2020(4):hoaa055. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa055. eCollection 2020.
4
Conservative treatment in non-tubal ectopic pregnancy and predictors of treatment failure.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Feb;257:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.067. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Evolution from medical to surgical management.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Dec;60(6):852-857. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13241. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD011174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011174.pub2.
7
Effectiveness of conservative medical treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a multicenter study.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 20:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101762.
8
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Registry: an international research platform.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):438-440. doi: 10.1002/uog.21952.
9
Nonsurgical Management of Interstitial Pregnancies: Feasibility and Predictors of Treatment Failure.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):625-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
10
Direct Methotrexate Injection into the Gestational Sac for Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Review of Efficacy and Outcomes from a Single Institution.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验