• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对澳大利亚一家三级医疗中心非输卵管异位妊娠管理结局的10年回顾性队列研究。

A 10-year retrospective cohort study of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy management outcomes in an Australian tertiary centre.

作者信息

Loh Wei-Guo Nicholas, Adno Alan Maurice, Reid Shannon

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Liverpool Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia.

South Western Sydney Clinical School University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Aug 3;25(4):166-175. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12312. eCollection 2022 Nov.

DOI:10.1002/ajum.12312
PMID:36405797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9644438/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy (NTEP) is a rare but significant early pregnancy complication which can result in maternal morbidity and mortality. There is however a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the management of NTEP.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the success rates of expectant, medical and surgical management in the treatment of NTEP at our tertiary centre.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2020. All NTEP were classified by ectopic sites. Primary management was classified by expectant, medical [systemic methotrexate (Sys-MTX) and/or local ultrasound-guided injection of MTX and/or KCl intra-sac (L-MTX, L-MTX/KCl)] or surgical. Primary management was considered successful if no change in intervention was required. Treatment complications were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-four NTEP were identified, which included 14 interstitial pregnancies (IP), 9 caesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) and 1 ovarian pregnancy (OP), which gave NTEP an incidence of 7.12% among all EP (4.15% for IP, 2.67% for CSP and 0.30% for OP). The success of primary surgical management was 100% (7/7), primary medical management was 76.9% (10/13) and primary expectant management was 33.3% (1/3). Primary medical management had a non-statistically significant greater mean time to serum ß-human Chorionic Gonadotrophin <5 IU/L, mean length of hospitalisation, mean number of follow-up visits and hospital re-presentation/readmissions compared to primary surgical management. There was no other difference in complication rates between the treatment management groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgery remains the most effective way to manage NTEP. However, medical management can be a safe and effective alternative option in carefully selected cases.

摘要

引言

非输卵管异位妊娠(NTEP)是一种罕见但严重的早期妊娠并发症,可导致孕产妇发病和死亡。然而,目前缺乏关于NTEP管理的循证指南。

目的

评估在我们的三级中心,期待治疗、药物治疗和手术治疗NTEP的成功率。

方法

对2010年至2020年进行回顾性队列研究。所有NTEP均按异位部位分类。初始治疗分为期待治疗、药物治疗[全身用甲氨蝶呤(Sys-MTX)和/或局部超声引导下向孕囊内注射甲氨蝶呤和/或氯化钾(L-MTX、L-MTX/KCl)]或手术治疗。如果无需改变干预措施,则初始治疗被视为成功。比较治疗并发症。

结果

共识别出24例NTEP,其中包括14例间质部妊娠(IP)、9例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)和1例卵巢妊娠(OP),NTEP在所有异位妊娠中的发生率为7.12%(IP为4.15%,CSP为2.67%,OP为0.30%)。初始手术治疗的成功率为100%(7/7),初始药物治疗为76.9%(10/13),初始期待治疗为33.3%(1/3)。与初始手术治疗相比,初始药物治疗至血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素<5 IU/L的平均时间、平均住院时间、平均随访次数及再次入院/住院的差异无统计学意义。治疗组之间的并发症发生率无其他差异。

结论

手术仍然是治疗NTEP最有效的方法。然而,在精心挑选的病例中,药物治疗可以是一种安全有效的替代选择。

相似文献

1
A 10-year retrospective cohort study of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy management outcomes in an Australian tertiary centre.一项针对澳大利亚一家三级医疗中心非输卵管异位妊娠管理结局的10年回顾性队列研究。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Aug 3;25(4):166-175. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12312. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Effectiveness of conservative medical treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a multicenter study.非输卵管异位妊娠保守药物治疗的有效性:一项多中心研究
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 20:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101762.
3
Direct Methotrexate Injection into the Gestational Sac for Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Review of Efficacy and Outcomes from a Single Institution.经阴道孕囊内注射甲氨蝶呤治疗非输卵管部位异位妊娠:单中心疗效和结局的回顾性研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
Exclusive use of intrasac potassium chloride and methotrexate for treating cesarean scar pregnancy: effectiveness and subsequent fecundity.单纯使用囊内氯化钾和甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:疗效及后续生育能力
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 May 18;2020(2):hoaa025. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa025. eCollection 2020.
5
Management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in France: Results of a practice survey.法国非输卵管异位妊娠的管理:一项实践调查结果。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Apr;51(4):102330. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102330. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
6
Comparison of management regimens following ultrasound diagnosis of nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.超声诊断非输卵管异位妊娠后管理方案的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2018 Apr;125(5):567-575. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14752. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Single-dose systemic methotrexate vs expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a placebo-controlled randomized trial.单剂量全身应用甲氨蝶呤与期待治疗输卵管异位妊娠的疗效比较:一项安慰剂对照随机试验
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;49(2):171-176. doi: 10.1002/uog.17329. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies at a large tertiary hospital.一家大型三级医院非输卵管异位妊娠的管理
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Jul;33(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Methotrexate vs placebo in early tubal ectopic pregnancy: a multi- centre double-blind randomised trial.甲氨蝶呤与安慰剂治疗早期输卵管异位妊娠的多中心双盲随机试验
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2012 Aug;7(3):238-43. doi: 10.2174/157488712802281321.
10
Conservative management of interstitial pregnancies: experience of a single centre.间质部妊娠的保守治疗:单中心经验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):848-853. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1417979. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical profile and management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy: Experience from a tertiary care hospital in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).非输卵管异位妊娠的临床特征与管理:来自阿拉伯联合酋长国一家三级医疗医院的经验
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;40(9):2063-2068. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.8584.
2
Evolution in training in ultrasound.超声培训的发展
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Nov 9;25(4):159. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12326. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Cesarean scar pregnancy IS an ectopic pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠是一种异位妊娠。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):831-832. doi: 10.1002/uog.24921.
2
A Cesarean scar pregnancy is not an ectopic pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠并非异位妊娠。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;59(4):424-427. doi: 10.1002/uog.24877. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice.超声检查中描述正常着床和异位妊娠的术语:ESHRE良好实践建议
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Dec 16;2020(4):hoaa055. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa055. eCollection 2020.
4
Conservative treatment in non-tubal ectopic pregnancy and predictors of treatment failure.非输卵管异位妊娠的保守治疗及治疗失败的预测因素。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Feb;257:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.067. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Evolution from medical to surgical management.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠:医疗向手术管理的演变。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Dec;60(6):852-857. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13241. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.非输卵管异位妊娠的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD011174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011174.pub2.
7
Effectiveness of conservative medical treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a multicenter study.非输卵管异位妊娠保守药物治疗的有效性:一项多中心研究
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 20:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101762.
8
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Registry: an international research platform.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠登记处:一个国际研究平台。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):438-440. doi: 10.1002/uog.21952.
9
Nonsurgical Management of Interstitial Pregnancies: Feasibility and Predictors of Treatment Failure.间质部妊娠的非手术治疗:治疗失败的可行性和预测因素。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):625-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
10
Direct Methotrexate Injection into the Gestational Sac for Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Review of Efficacy and Outcomes from a Single Institution.经阴道孕囊内注射甲氨蝶呤治疗非输卵管部位异位妊娠:单中心疗效和结局的回顾性研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 28.