Mariotti Chiara, Romero María José
European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad), Brussels, Belgium.
Development (Rome). 2022;65(2-4):217-227. doi: 10.1057/s41301-022-00354-z. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
This article reviews Bretton Woods Institutions' approach to public services, including during the recent COVID-19 crisis. Drawing on the specific case of IMF and World Bank's response to the multiple crisis triggered by the pandemic, it shows that there is a discourse-practice disjuncture in the institutions approach to public services as they continue to favour austerity and market-oriented solutions for the delivery of public services. The article therefore seeks to demystify the Bretton Woods institutions rhetoric and demand the adoption of a different way of understanding public services, and social policy more broadly.
本文回顾了布雷顿森林机构对待公共服务的方式,包括在近期新冠疫情危机期间的做法。通过国际货币基金组织(IMF)和世界银行应对疫情引发的多重危机的具体案例,表明这些机构在公共服务问题上存在话语与实践的脱节,因为它们在公共服务提供方面继续倾向于紧缩政策和以市场为导向的解决方案。因此,本文旨在揭开布雷顿森林机构言辞的神秘面纱,并要求采用一种不同的方式来理解公共服务以及更广泛的社会政策。