• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响泰国东北部有机稻农群体参与集体营销的因素。

Factors influencing participation in collective marketing through organic rice farmer groups in northeast Thailand.

作者信息

Methamontri Yupadee, Tsusaka Takuji W, Zulfiqar Farhad, Yukongdi Vimolwan, Datta Avishek

机构信息

Agribusiness Management, Department of Food, Agriculture and Bioresources, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.

Natural Resources Management, Department of Development and Sustainability, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2022 Nov 7;8(11):e11421. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11421. eCollection 2022 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11421
PMID:36406729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9668679/
Abstract

Despite the significant roles of farmer groups in collective action for production and marketing of organic paddy, limited literature has studied the farmer-level determinants of participation in collective action in northeast Thailand. This study examined factors associated with participation in collective marketing for three organic rice farmer groups (Nam Om Community Enterprise Network, Na So Farmer Group, and Moral Rice Farmer Group) in Yasothon Province of Thailand, producing organic jasmine rice for export and domestic markets through contract farming. Primary data were collected from 335 farmers and analyzed by descriptive statistics and the two-limit tobit regression method. The descriptive results showed relatively high levels of social, economic, institutional, and environmental benefits arising from the participation in those groups. In particular, environmental benefits were higher than the other types of benefits. The regression analysis found that age and agricultural loan negatively influenced the extent of participation in collective marketing through farmer groups, whereas education, paddy cultivation area size, non-agricultural income, experience in rice farming, experience in organic rice farming, group membership duration, perceived economic benefits, and membership with Na So farmer group were positively associated with the extent of participation. The effect of experience with organic rice farming was relatively small in Na So Farmer Group. The findings suggest that economic benefits from participation in organic farmer groups should be enhanced in order to increase the collective marketing of organic rice produce. Moreover, the government should provide alternative employment opportunities, knowledge-based training, and low-interest credit to support production and collective marketing of organic rice.

摘要

尽管农民团体在有机水稻生产和销售的集体行动中发挥着重要作用,但在泰国东北部,针对农民层面参与集体行动的决定因素的研究文献有限。本研究调查了泰国也梭通府三个有机水稻农民团体(南翁社区企业网络、纳索农民团体和道德水稻农民团体)参与集体销售的相关因素,这些团体通过订单农业生产有机茉莉香米供应出口和国内市场。从335名农民那里收集了原始数据,并通过描述性统计和双限托宾回归方法进行分析。描述性结果显示,参与这些团体带来了较高水平的社会、经济、制度和环境效益。特别是,环境效益高于其他类型的效益。回归分析发现,年龄和农业贷款对通过农民团体参与集体销售的程度有负面影响,而教育程度、水稻种植面积规模、非农业收入、水稻种植经验、有机水稻种植经验、团体成员资格时长、感知到的经济效益以及成为纳索农民团体的成员与参与程度呈正相关。在纳索农民团体中,有机水稻种植经验的影响相对较小。研究结果表明,应提高参与有机农民团体的经济效益,以增加有机水稻产品的集体销售。此外,政府应提供替代就业机会、基于知识的培训和低息信贷,以支持有机水稻的生产和集体销售。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d0/9668679/8358314d7424/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d0/9668679/9d0081e062c8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d0/9668679/8358314d7424/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d0/9668679/9d0081e062c8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41d0/9668679/8358314d7424/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors influencing participation in collective marketing through organic rice farmer groups in northeast Thailand.影响泰国东北部有机稻农群体参与集体营销的因素。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 7;8(11):e11421. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11421. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Estimating effects of cooperative membership on farmers' safe production behaviors: evidence from the rice sector in China.评估合作社成员身份对农民安全生产行为的影响:来自中国水稻部门的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):25400-25418. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12337-z. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Model development for health promotion and control of agricultural occupational health hazards and accidents in Pathumthani, Thailand.泰国巴吞他尼府促进健康及控制农业职业健康危害与事故的模型开发
Ind Health. 2005 Oct;43(4):669-76. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.43.669.
4
Food self-sufficiency: Managing the newly-opened tidal paddy fields for rice farming in Indonesia (A case study in West Kalimantan, Indonesia).粮食自给自足:印度尼西亚新开垦潮汐稻田的水稻种植管理(印度尼西亚西加里曼丹的案例研究)
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 20;9(3):e13839. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13839. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Technical efficiency among agricultural households and determinants of food security in East Java, Indonesia.印度尼西亚东爪哇省农户的技术效率及其粮食安全决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 18;11(1):4141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83670-7.
6
Policies, Socioeconomic, Institutional and Biophysical Factors Influencing the Change from Rice to Sugarcane in Nong Bua Lamphu Province, Thailand.影响泰国廊磨喃蒲府从水稻种植转变为甘蔗种植的政策、社会经济、制度和生物物理因素
Environ Manage. 2017 Jun;59(6):924-938. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0843-2. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Pesticide toxicity assessment and geographic information system (GIS) application in small-scale rice farming operations, Thailand.泰国小型水稻种植作业中的农药毒性评估和地理信息系统(GIS)应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):499. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04523-x.
8
Environmental risks among rice farmers and factors influencing their risk perceptions and attitudes in Punjab, Pakistan.巴基斯坦旁遮普邦的水稻种植户面临的环境风险,以及影响他们风险认知和态度的因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(17):21953-21964. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08771-8. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
Factors accelerating agricultural innovation and sustainability: The case of paddy farmers.加速农业创新与可持续发展的因素:以稻农为例。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2022 May;18(3):824-835. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4518. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
Life cycle GHG evaluation of organic rice production in northern Thailand.泰国北部有机水稻生产的生命周期温室气体评估
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jul 1;196:217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Data driven analysis of social capital in Farmer Producer Companies.农民生产公司社会资本的数据驱动分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 24;9(7):e17489. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17489. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Farm household access to agricultural services in northern Ghana.加纳北部农户获得农业服务的情况。
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 18;6(11):e05517. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05517. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Factors Influencing the Intensity of Adoption of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Thailand.影响泰国小农采用可持续棕榈油圆桌会议实践强度的因素。
Environ Manage. 2020 Sep;66(3):377-394. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01323-3. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
3
A model of farmers intentions towards organic farming: A case study on rice farming in Thailand.
农民对有机农业的意向模型:以泰国水稻种植为例
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 28;6(1):e03039. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03039. eCollection 2020 Jan.
4
Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap.综合指标中的权重与重要性:缩小差距。
Ecol Indic. 2017 Sep;80:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056.
5
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming.有机农业对农民健康更安全吗?有机农业与传统农业的比较。
Toxicol Lett. 2014 Oct 15;230(2):166-76. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 24.