Wijnen Frances, Walma van der Molen Juliette, Voogt Joke
Department of Teacher Development, ELAN, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(6):6347-6372. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11413-w. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
Critical thinking, creative thinking, problem solving and other so-called higher-order thinking skills are regarded as crucial for students to develop. Research shows that technology can be used as a tool to stimulate students' higher-order thinking skills. However, most teachers rarely use new technology to stimulate students to engage in higher-order thinking. To help teachers in this, we need to gain an understanding of teachers' towards using new technology and towards stimulating higher-order thinking. In this study, we explore these teacher attitudes by identifying teacher profiles based on primary school teachers' attitudes (N = 659) towards (a) using new technology and (b) stimulating higher-order thinking. Results of the cluster-analysis revealed three teacher profiles. In follow-up focus group interviews with 21 participants, we found that teachers recognized the identified profiles and that the results of the cluster-analysis matched teachers' self-chosen profiles in almost all cases. These results indicate that we can suitably characterize teachers based on their attitudes towards using new technology and stimulating higher-order thinking. Identification of these profiles may help us understand why certain groups of teachers may use new technology to stimulate students' higher-order thinking, while other teachers might not. This might provide starting points for tailored teacher professionalization for different groups of teachers.
批判性思维、创造性思维、解决问题的能力以及其他所谓的高阶思维技能,被认为对学生的发展至关重要。研究表明,技术可以用作激发学生高阶思维技能的工具。然而,大多数教师很少使用新技术来激发学生进行高阶思维。为了在这方面帮助教师,我们需要了解教师对于使用新技术以及激发高阶思维的态度。在本研究中,我们通过根据小学教师(N = 659)对(a)使用新技术和(b)激发高阶思维的态度来确定教师类型,从而探究这些教师态度。聚类分析的结果揭示了三种教师类型。在对21名参与者进行的后续焦点小组访谈中,我们发现教师认可所确定的类型,并且聚类分析的结果在几乎所有情况下都与教师自己选择的类型相匹配。这些结果表明,我们可以根据教师对使用新技术和激发高阶思维的态度适当地对教师进行分类。识别这些类型可能有助于我们理解为什么某些教师群体可能会使用新技术来激发学生的高阶思维,而其他教师可能不会。这可能为针对不同教师群体的量身定制的教师专业化提供起点。