Alammari Duaa, Banta Jim E, Shah Huma, Reibling Ellen, Talsania Shrenik
Health System Management, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Public Health, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 16;14(10):e30343. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30343. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Background This study aimed to measure the association between electronic health record (EHR) use and quality measures in ambulatory healthcare. Methodology A quantitative, retrospective, cross-sectional design was used by examining secondary data from the 2015-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. The relationship between EHR use and seven quality measures was examined using the Donabedian model as a framework. Quality measures included (a) diabetes measures, (b) obesity measures, (c) blood pressure screening, (d) depression screening, and (e) breast cancer screening. A total of 37,290 office visits were included, representing 817 million national office visits. For each of the quality measures, we determined the (a) associations using unadjusted and adjusted regression models based on subsets of the sample that met the inclusion criteria for quality measures; and (b) the changes in the area under the curve (AUC). Results Approximately 75% of office visits fulfilled all EHR use. Positive associations were found between EHR use and better quality for the following three out of seven measures: higher odds of screening for obesity (odds ratio (OR) = 2.2; p = <0.0001), blood pressure (OR = 2.5; p = <0.0001), and breast cancer (OR = 1.8; p = 0.0166). Receiver operating curve results showed the highest gain in the AUC for process-grouped measures. Hence, it was considered to be a strong predictor for all quality measures. Conclusions Evidence showed improvement in some quality measures (screening for obesity, blood pressure, and breast cancer). Common and standardized health processes were more likely to be completed and recorded than others. Future policies concerning health information technology can shift the focus from improving EHR use to enhancing patient and quality outcomes. Further research is needed to identify circumstances where quality is improved.
背景 本研究旨在衡量门诊医疗中电子健康记录(EHR)的使用与质量指标之间的关联。方法 采用定量、回顾性横断面设计,通过检查2015 - 2016年国家门诊医疗调查的二手数据。以唐纳贝迪安模型为框架,研究EHR使用与七个质量指标之间的关系。质量指标包括:(a)糖尿病指标;(b)肥胖指标;(c)血压筛查;(d)抑郁症筛查;(e)乳腺癌筛查。共纳入37290次门诊就诊,代表8.17亿次全国门诊就诊。对于每个质量指标,我们确定:(a)基于符合质量指标纳入标准的样本子集,使用未调整和调整回归模型的关联;(b)曲线下面积(AUC)的变化。结果 约75%的门诊就诊实现了全部EHR使用。在七个指标中的以下三个指标上,发现EHR使用与更高质量之间存在正相关:肥胖筛查几率更高(优势比(OR)= 2.2;p = <0.0001)、血压(OR = 2.5;p = <0.0001)和乳腺癌(OR = 1.8;p = 0.0166)。接受者操作曲线结果显示,过程分组指标的AUC增益最高。因此,它被认为是所有质量指标的有力预测指标。结论 证据表明某些质量指标(肥胖、血压和乳腺癌筛查)有所改善。常见和标准化的健康流程比其他流程更有可能完成并记录。未来有关健康信息技术的政策可将重点从改善EHR使用转向提高患者和质量结果。需要进一步研究以确定质量得到改善的情况。