Li Xinrui, Li Zichao, Yi Xiaowei, Gao Xianchun, Yang Zhe, Huang Xingning, Ma Sijie, Ma Tianyuan, Deng Ziyi, Shang Lei, Jian Zhe
School of Medicine, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 2;12:929600. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.929600. eCollection 2022.
Observational studies suggest that ulceration is considered to be a negative prognostic factor for cutaneous melanoma. However, the impact of ulceration over different subgroups (e.g. AJCC Stage, thickness level) are controversial and its true causal effect on survival is lack of studies in the view of treating ulceration as an exposure.
To explore the true causal effect of ulceration on melanoma's survival by adopting a combination of methods to discover proper adjustment set and confirming its correctness through a variety of means.
A minimal sufficient adjustment set (MSAS) was found using directed acyclic graphs (DAG) to adjust the effect of causality. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to diagnose potential confounders in addition to MSAS. Cox models were built to analyze the causality in-depth and the model was validated using a novel method. Lastly, stratified effects of ulceration were examined to illustrate its impact within subgroups.
Hazard ratio (HR) of ulceration after adjustment by MSAS variables was 1.99 (95% CI=1.88-2.09). The sensitivity analysis of propensity score matching and E-value both demonstrated that variables other than MSAS do not have great influence on ulceration and MSS relationship. The HR of ulceration in AJCC Stage, thickness level, invasion level and tumor extension were all monotonically decreased from 5.76 to 1.57, 4.03 to 1.78, 2.75 to 1.78 and 2.65 to 1.71 respectively.
Ulceration in all subgroups were shown to have a significantly negative impact on MSS and its magnitude of effect was monotonically decreased as the disease progressed. The true effect of ulceration can be adjusted by MSAS and its correctness was validated through a variety of approaches.
观察性研究表明,溃疡被认为是皮肤黑色素瘤的一个不良预后因素。然而,溃疡在不同亚组(如美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期、厚度水平)中的影响存在争议,并且从将溃疡视为一种暴露因素的角度来看,其对生存的真正因果效应缺乏研究。
通过采用多种方法来发现合适的调整集,并通过多种手段确认其正确性,以探索溃疡对黑色素瘤生存的真正因果效应。
使用有向无环图(DAG)找到一个最小充分调整集(MSAS)来调整因果效应。除了MSAS之外,还进行了敏感性分析以诊断潜在的混杂因素。构建Cox模型以深入分析因果关系,并使用一种新方法对模型进行验证。最后,检查溃疡的分层效应以说明其在亚组中的影响。
经MSAS变量调整后,溃疡的风险比(HR)为1.99(95%置信区间=1.88 - 2.09)。倾向得分匹配和E值的敏感性分析均表明,除MSAS之外的变量对溃疡和最小充分集(MSS)关系没有很大影响。AJCC分期、厚度水平、浸润水平和肿瘤扩展中溃疡的HR分别从5.76单调下降至1.57、从4.03下降至1.78、从2.75下降至1.78以及从2.65下降至1.71。
所有亚组中的溃疡均对MSS有显著负面影响,并且随着疾病进展,其影响程度单调下降。溃疡的真正效应可以通过MSAS进行调整,并且其正确性通过多种方法得到了验证。