Suppr超能文献

减少发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的重复血培养:单中心经验

Reducing Repeat Blood Cultures in Febrile Neutropenia: A Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Robinson Evan D, Keng Michael K, Thomas Tanya D, Cox Heather L, Park Stacy C, Mathers Amy J

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 14;9(11):ofac521. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac521. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist to guide blood culture ordering in persistent febrile neutropenia (FN), resulting in substantial variation in practice. Unnecessary repeat blood cultures have been associated with patient harm including increased antimicrobial exposure, hospital length of stay, catheter removal, and overall cost.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center study of adult hematology-oncology patients with ≥3 days of FN. The yield of blood cultures was first evaluated in a 2-year historical cohort. Additionally, a pilot pre-/postintervention study was performed in non-stem cell transplant (SCT) patients following a change in our population clinical practice guideline from a recommendation of daily blood cultures to a clinically guided approach. The primary outcome was cultures collected per days of FN after day 3 of persistent FN.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six episodes of ≥3 days of FN in 108 patients were identified during the historical period. Day 1 blood cultures were positive in 23 of 146 (16%) episodes. Blood cultures were drawn on 374 of 513 (73%) subsequent episode-days (day 2-12) and were negative in 366 of 374 (98%). After the intervention, a 53% decrease was observed in the rate of total blood cultures collected (1.4 preintervention vs 0.7 postintervention; = .03). Blood cultures obtained after 48 hours rarely yielded clinically significant organisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat blood cultures are low-yield in persistent FN without new clinical change. A pilot intervention in non-SCT patients successfully reduced the frequency of blood culture collection.

摘要

背景

关于持续性发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)患者血培养送检的指导数据有限,导致临床实践差异很大。不必要的重复血培养与患者伤害相关,包括抗菌药物暴露增加、住院时间延长、导管拔除和总体费用增加。

方法

我们对成年血液肿瘤患者进行了一项单中心研究,这些患者的FN持续时间≥3天。首先在一个为期2年的历史队列中评估血培养的阳性率。此外,在非干细胞移植(SCT)患者中进行了一项干预前后的试点研究,此前我们的人群临床实践指南从每日血培养的建议改为临床指导方法。主要结局是持续性FN第3天后每FN日采集的血培养次数。

结果

在历史时期内,共识别出108例患者的146次FN发作,持续时间≥3天。146次发作中有23次(16%)第1天血培养呈阳性。在随后的513个发作日(第2 - 12天)中的374天(73%)进行了血培养,其中374次中有366次(98%)为阴性。干预后,采集的血培养总数减少了53%(干预前为1.4次,干预后为0.7次;P = 0.03)。48小时后采集的血培养很少培养出具有临床意义的微生物。

结论

在无新的临床变化的持续性FN中,重复血培养的阳性率较低。对非SCT患者的一项试点干预成功降低了血培养采集频率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a72/9669456/cd1f7a9f8f90/ofac521f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验