• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受腹膜透析的新患者中,定期面对面随访是否优于非定期面对面随访对临床结局的影响。

Is regular in-person recall superior to non-regular in-person recall in clinical outcomes among new patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):2010-2018. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2145972.

DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2022.2145972
PMID:36408926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9683045/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the different impacts on clinical outcomes between regular recall and non-regular recall among incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS

A two-center cohort of 216 new PD patients from 1January 2013, to 31 December 2014, was studied. Informative clinical data were collected from baseline until two years after PD initiation, including demographics, laboratory and PD-related parameters, PD-related peritonitis rates, and frequency of hospitalization. Regular in-person recall (RPR) was defined as having a one-month interval and non-regular in-person recall (NRPR) as an interval ranging from more than one month to less than three months.

RESULTS

Percentage of patients with peritonitis was significantly higher among patients in the NRPR group than among those in the RPR group (27.7% vs. 16.5%,  = .049). PD-related peritonitis rate was higher in the NRPR vs. RPR cohorts (0.16 vs. 0.09 person/year,  = .019). PD-related hospitalization frequency was also higher in the NRPR cohort (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 0.5 ± 0.9,  = .039) over two years. Kt/ values in the NRPR cohort gradually decreased over two years and were at lower levels than in the RPR cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

New PD patients with NRPR showed higher rates of PD-related peritonitis and hospitalization frequency than patients with RPR.

摘要

目的

探讨定期随访与不定期随访对新置腹膜透析(PD)患者临床结局的不同影响。

方法

本研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间在两家中心就诊的 216 例新置 PD 患者。收集了基线至 PD 开始后两年的信息性临床数据,包括人口统计学、实验室和 PD 相关参数、PD 相关腹膜炎发生率以及住院频率。定期面对面随访(RPR)定义为 1 个月间隔,不定期面对面随访(NRPR)定义为间隔时间超过 1 个月但少于 3 个月。

结果

NRPR 组患者腹膜炎发生率显著高于 RPR 组(27.7% vs. 16.5%, = .049)。NRPR 组 PD 相关腹膜炎发生率高于 RPR 组(0.16 vs. 0.09 人/年, = .019)。NRPR 组 PD 相关住院频率在两年内也较高(0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 0.5 ± 0.9, = .039)。NRPR 组在两年内的 Kt/V 值逐渐下降,且水平低于 RPR 组。

结论

NRPR 的新置 PD 患者腹膜炎和住院频率发生率高于 RPR 的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e6b/9683045/f314a5081faa/IRNF_A_2145972_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e6b/9683045/f314a5081faa/IRNF_A_2145972_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e6b/9683045/f314a5081faa/IRNF_A_2145972_F0001_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Is regular in-person recall superior to non-regular in-person recall in clinical outcomes among new patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.在接受腹膜透析的新患者中,定期面对面随访是否优于非定期面对面随访对临床结局的影响。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):2010-2018. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2145972.
2
Changes in Outcomes over Time Among Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in Southern China.中国南方新发生腹膜透析患者的结局随时间的变化。
Perit Dial Int. 2019 Jul-Aug;39(4):382-389. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2018.00256. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Center Effects and Peritoneal Dialysis Peritonitis Outcomes: Analysis of a National Registry.中心效应与腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎结局:全国登记数据分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jun;71(6):814-821. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infection Rates and Outcomes: Results From the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS).腹膜透析相关感染率和结局:来自腹膜透析结局和实践模式研究(PDOPPS)的结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jul;76(1):42-53. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.016. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Self-Care Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Cognitive Impairment Have a Higher Risk of Peritonitis in the Second Year.认知功能障碍的自我护理腹膜透析患者在第二年发生腹膜炎的风险更高。
Perit Dial Int. 2019 Jan-Feb;39(1):51-58. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2018.00048. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
First-year outcomes of incident peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States.美国新入组腹膜透析患者的 1 年转归。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Nov;64(5):761-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
7
Effect of national holidays on health outcomes of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis in a single center over a ten-year period.国家法定节假日对单中心十年间腹膜透析患者健康结局的影响。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2153697. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2153697.
8
[Effect of peritonitis frequency on the effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis and effect of peritoneal dialysis effectiveness on the frequency of peritonitis].[腹膜炎发生频率对腹膜透析疗效的影响及腹膜透析疗效对腹膜炎发生频率的影响]
Acta Med Croatica. 2003;57(1):43-7.
9
The association between peritoneal dialysis modality and peritonitis.腹膜透析方式与腹膜炎的关系。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):1091-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09730913. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
10
Culture-negative peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients in Australia: predictors, treatment, and outcomes in 435 cases.澳大利亚腹膜透析患者的无培养阳性腹膜炎:435 例患者的预测因素、治疗和结局。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Apr;55(4):690-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.015. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition and Frailty: Opportunities for Prevention and Treatment.营养与虚弱:预防和治疗的机会。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 9;13(7):2349. doi: 10.3390/nu13072349.
2
Preserving Mobility in Older Adults with Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations for Physical Activity Interventions.维持体弱和肌少症老年人的活动能力:身体活动干预的机会、挑战和建议。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Sep 16;15:1675-1690. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S253535. eCollection 2020.
3
Prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis by regular patient retraining via technique inspection or oral education: a randomized controlled trial.
通过技术检查或口头教育定期对患者进行再培训以预防腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎:一项随机对照试验。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Apr 1;35(4):676-686. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz238.
4
Exploring the utility and scalability of a telehomecare intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis-a study protocol.探索针对接受腹膜透析的慢性肾病患者的远程家庭护理干预措施的效用和可扩展性——一项研究方案
BMC Nephrol. 2017 May 10;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0557-y.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Remote Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Single Center in China.远程腹膜透析患者的临床结局:来自中国单中心的一项回顾性队列研究。
Blood Purif. 2016;41(1-3):100-7. doi: 10.1159/000442516. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Non-adherence in patients on peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review.腹膜透析患者的不依从性:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089001. eCollection 2014.
7
Comparing mortality of peritoneal and hemodialysis patients in the first 2 years of dialysis therapy: a marginal structural model analysis.比较腹膜透析和血液透析患者在透析治疗的前 2 年的死亡率:边缘结构模型分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Apr;8(4):619-28. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04810512. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
8
The effects of living distantly from peritoneal dialysis units on peritonitis risk, microbiology, treatment and outcomes: a multi-centre registry study.居住距离腹膜透析单位较远对腹膜炎风险、微生物学、治疗和结局的影响:一项多中心登记研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2012 Jun 15;13:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-41.
9
Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis.全球腹膜透析率趋势。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Mar;23(3):533-44. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011060607. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
10
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations on Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy 2011.《2011年腹膜透析充分性临床实践指南与建议》
Perit Dial Int. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):218-39. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00026.