Rovetta Alessandro, Castaldo Lucia
R&C Research Bovezzo (Brescia) Italy.
JMIRx Med. 2022 Jul 21;3(3):e36510. doi: 10.2196/36510. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
Infodemic is defined as an information epidemic that can lead to engaging in dangerous behavior. Although the most striking manifestations of the latter occurred on social media, some studies show that dismisinformation is significantly influenced by numerous additional factors, both web-based and offline. These include social context, age, education, personal knowledge and beliefs, mood, psychological defense mechanisms, media resonance, and how news and information are presented to the public. Moreover, various incorrect scientific practices related to disclosure, publication, and training can also fuel such a phenomenon. Therefore, in this opinion article, we seek to provide a comprehensive overview of the issues that need to be addressed to bridge the gap between science and the public and build resilience to the infodemic. In particular, we stress that the infodemic cannot be curbed by simply disproving every single false or misleading information since the belief system and the cultural or educational background are chief factors regarding the success of fake news. For this reason, we believe that the process of forming a critical sense should begin with children in schools (ie, when the mind is more receptive to new ways of learning). Furthermore, we also believe that themes such as scientific method and evidence should be at the heart of the university education of a future scientist. Indeed, both the public and scientists must be educated on the concepts of evidence and validity of sources, as well as learning how to dialogue appropriately with each other. Finally, we believe that the scientific publishing process could be greatly improved by paying reviewers for their work and by ceasing to pursue academic success at all costs.
信息疫情被定义为一种可能导致人们采取危险行为的信息泛滥现象。尽管其最显著的表现发生在社交媒体上,但一些研究表明,错误信息受到众多其他因素的显著影响,包括基于网络和线下的因素。这些因素包括社会背景、年龄、教育程度、个人知识和信仰、情绪、心理防御机制、媒体共鸣,以及新闻和信息向公众呈现的方式。此外,与披露、发表和培训相关的各种不正确的科学做法也可能助长这种现象。因此,在这篇观点文章中,我们试图全面概述为弥合科学与公众之间的差距以及增强对信息疫情的抵御能力而需要解决的问题。特别是,我们强调不能仅仅通过反驳每一条虚假或误导性信息来遏制信息疫情,因为信仰体系以及文化或教育背景是虚假新闻成功传播的主要因素。出于这个原因,我们认为培养批判性思维的过程应该从学校里的孩子开始(也就是说,当思维更容易接受新的学习方式时)。此外,我们还认为科学方法和证据等主题应该成为未来科学家大学教育的核心。确实,公众和科学家都必须接受关于证据和信息来源有效性的概念教育,以及学习如何相互进行恰当的对话。最后,我们认为通过为审稿人的工作付费以及不再不惜一切代价追求学术成就,可以极大地改进科学出版过程。