Suppr超能文献

人、猪和牛脱细胞真皮基质在前胸乳房重建中的比较:一项范围综述

Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Pires Giovanna R, Moss Whitney D, Hosein Ray C, Overschmidt Bo T, Magno-Padron David A, Agarwal Jayant P, McFarland Mary M, Casucci Tallie, Kwok Alvin C

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Dec 1;89(6):694-702. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003319.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to determine rates of overall complications and failure of prepectoral breast reconstruction between various types of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs).

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive technique after mastectomy in the United States. Traditionally, the reconstruction has been performed in the subpectoral plane; however, there has been an emerging interest in prepectoral reconstruction using ADM. Human (hADM), porcine (pADM), and bovine (bADM) ADMs are available for use, but little is known about the benefits and complication profiles of each for prepectoral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Studies examining complications after the use of ADM for prepectoral breast reconstruction were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and the Web of Science from January 2010 to August 2021. Titles and abstracts of 1838 studies were screened, followed by full-text screening of 355 articles. Thirty-three studies were found to meet inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

From the 33 studies, 6046 prepectoral reconstructions were examined. Implant loss was comparable across the different types of ADM (pADM, 4.0%; hADM, 4.0%; bADM, 3.7%). Bovine ADM had the highest rate of capsular contracture (6.1%), infection (9.0%), skin flap necrosis (8.3%), dehiscence (5.4%), and hematoma (6.1%) when compared with both hADM and pADM. Human ADM had the highest rate of postoperative seroma (5.3%), followed by pADM (4.6%) and bADM (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the prepectoral breast reconstruction studies using hADM, pADM, or bADM included in our analysis, complication profiles were similar. Bovine ADM had the highest proportion of breast complications in the following categories: capsular contracture, infection rate, skin flap necrosis, dehiscence, and hematoma. Implant loss was comparable across the cohorts. Overall, prepectoral breast reconstruction using ADM leads to relatively low complication rates with the highest rates within the bADM cohort.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定不同类型的脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)用于胸前区乳房重建的总体并发症发生率及失败率。

背景

在美国,基于植入物的乳房重建是乳房切除术后最常见的重建技术。传统上,重建手术是在胸大肌下平面进行;然而,使用ADM进行胸前区重建越来越受到关注。人源(hADM)、猪源(pADM)和牛源(bADM)的ADM均可使用,但对于每种ADM用于胸前区乳房重建的益处和并发症情况了解甚少。

方法

通过检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、LILACS以及科学网,确定2010年1月至2021年8月期间使用ADM进行胸前区乳房重建后并发症的相关研究。对1838项研究的标题和摘要进行筛选,随后对355篇文章进行全文筛选。发现33项研究符合纳入标准。

结果

在这33项研究中,共检查了6046例胸前区重建病例。不同类型ADM的植入物丢失率相当(pADM为4.0%;hADM为4.0%;bADM为3.7%)。与hADM和pADM相比,牛源ADM的包膜挛缩率(6.1%)、感染率(9.0%)、皮瓣坏死率(8.3%)、裂开率(5.4%)和血肿率(6.1%)最高。人源ADM的术后血清肿发生率最高(5.3%),其次是猪源ADM(4.6%)和牛源ADM(4.5%)。

结论

在我们分析的使用hADM、pADM或bADM进行胸前区乳房重建的研究中,并发症情况相似。牛源ADM在以下类别中的乳房并发症比例最高:包膜挛缩、感染率、皮瓣坏死、裂开和血肿。各队列中的植入物丢失率相当。总体而言,使用ADM进行胸前区乳房重建导致的并发症发生率相对较低,其中牛源ADM队列中的发生率最高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验